S1970 Empiric Antibiotic Use With Rescue Infliximab Does Not Improve Outcomes in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC) can be life-threatening and may result in poor outcomes. Approximately 30–50% of patients fail to respond to initial corticosteroid treatment and infliximab is often used as rescue therapy. In clinical settings, antibiotics are sometimes empirically administered with infliximab, though evidence supporting improved outcomes is lacking. We evaluated the impact of concurrent antibiotic use with infliximab in ASUC. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX platform. International Classification of Diseases-10 code K51, procedure codes, visit diagnosis codes, and keywords such as “antibiotics” and “infliximab” were used to identify eligible patients from 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2022. We compared 2 cohorts. 1: Patients who received infliximab on or within one day of admission and antibiotics on or within one day after infliximab administration (n = 1,341). 2: Patients who received infliximab on or within one day of admission but did not receive antibiotics within 3 days after infliximab administration (n = 1,447). Propensity score matching was performed for baseline characteristics. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included IBD-related surgery, ICU care, emergency department (ED) utilization, and sepsis. Results: A total of 1,028 patients out of 2,788 met criteria and were included in the analysis. Males formed the majority (51.5% in Cohort 1, 53.3% in Cohort 2); mean age was 40 years in both groups. A total of 10 deaths occurred in each group (risk difference = 0; OR = 1.0). 39 patients in Cohort 1 vs 29 in Cohort 2 developed sepsis (risk difference = 0.973%; OR = 1.3; 95% CI: 0.833–2.214). Conclusion: Mucosal injury in ASUC may lead to bacterial translocation, with increased risk of sepsis. This has prompted empiric antibiotic use in clinical practice. There was no difference in mortality or major outcomes between patients who did and did not receive antibiotics with infliximab. Antibiotic use was not associated with reduced sepsis risk and may contribute to higher healthcare costs and antimicrobial resistance. These results highlight the importance of antimicrobial stewardship and the need for further prospective studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001135340.34485.34
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1970 Empiric Antibiotic Use With Rescue Infliximab Does Not Improve Outcomes in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Kara DiJoseph, Kofi Clarke, Andrew Tinsley, Matthew Coates et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1970 Empiric Antibiotic Use With Rescue Infliximab Does Not Improve Outcomes in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Kara DiJoseph, Kofi Clarke, Andrew Tinsley, Matthew Coates, Shannon Dalessio, Emmanuelle Williams, Dominic Ofosu-Amakye
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC) can be life-threatening and may result in poor outcomes. Approximately 30–50% of patients fail to respond to initial corticosteroid treatment and infliximab is often used as rescue therapy. In clinical settings, antibiotics are sometimes empirically administered with infliximab, though evidence supporting improved outcomes is lacking. We evaluated the impact of concurrent antibiotic use with infliximab in ASUC. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX platform. International Classification of Diseases-10 code K51, procedure codes, visit diagnosis codes, and keywords such as “antibiotics” and “infliximab” were used to identify eligible patients from 01/01/2013 to 12/31/2022. We compared 2 cohorts. 1: Patients who received infliximab on or within one day of admission and antibiotics on or within one day after infliximab administration (n = 1,341). 2: Patients who received infliximab on or within one day of admission but did not receive antibiotics within 3 days after infliximab administration (n = 1,447). Propensity score matching was performed for baseline characteristics. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included IBD-related surgery, ICU care, emergency department (ED) utilization, and sepsis. Results: A total of 1,028 patients out of 2,788 met criteria and were included in the analysis. Males formed the majority (51.5% in Cohort 1, 53.3% in Cohort 2); mean age was 40 years in both groups. A total of 10 deaths occurred in each group (risk difference = 0; OR = 1.0). 39 patients in Cohort 1 vs 29 in Cohort 2 developed sepsis (risk difference = 0.973%; OR = 1.3; 95% CI: 0.833–2.214). Conclusion: Mucosal injury in ASUC may lead to bacterial translocation, with increased risk of sepsis. This has prompted empiric antibiotic use in clinical practice. There was no difference in mortality or major outcomes between patients who did and did not receive antibiotics with infliximab. Antibiotic use was not associated with reduced sepsis risk and may contribute to higher healthcare costs and antimicrobial resistance. These results highlight the importance of antimicrobial stewardship and the need for further prospective studies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.