S1798 Real-World Comparison of Infliximab and Adalimumab for Remission Induction in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Propensity-Matched Study

Introduction: Infliximab and adalimumab are widely used biologic therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). While both are effective, few studies have directly compared their roles in remission induction using biomarker-based objective measures across IBD subtypes. This study evaluates the comparative efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab in achieving biomarker-based remission in IBD patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX data from 93 healthcare organizations. A total of 31,700 adult patients (≥18 years) with IBD treated with infliximab or adalimumab between 2018 and 2023 were initially identified. Propensity score matching was performed to balance age, sex, race/ethnicity, disease severity, and comorbidities, resulting in 13,176 matched IBD patients per treatment group (total n = 26,352). The primary outcome was biomarker-based remission, defined as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤5 mg/L or fecal calprotectin ≤150 µg/g, and assessed at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. Induction of remission rates and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were reported for the overall IBD cohort and separately for CD and UC subgroups. Results: Infliximab demonstrated consistently higher remission rates than Adalimumab across all time points (P < 0.001). At 6 months, remission was achieved more frequently with Infliximab in IBD (38.8% vs 29.0%), UC (35.3% vs 25.4%), and CD (38.5% vs 28.3%). This pattern was held at 1 year (IBD: 50.4% vs 43.1%; UC: 46.3% vs 37.1%; CD: 49.8% vs 42.6%), 3 years (IBD: 66.6% vs 62.8%; UC: 61.9% vs 55.0%; CD: 66.1% vs 62.7%), and 5 years (IBD: 71.4% vs 68.9%; UC: 65.9% vs 60.0%; CD: 71.2% vs 68.5%). Hazard ratios (HR) were directionally standardized to reflect infliximab over adalimumab (infliximab/adalimumab). Therefore, HR >1 indicates faster remission with Infliximab. Infliximab was associated with a significantly shorter time to remission across all time points in IBD, CD, and UC (all HRs > 1, P < 0.001). Median time to remission was also consistently shorter with Infliximab compared to Adalimumab across all disease groups. This supports the hazard ratio findings and further shows a faster induction of remission with Infliximab. Conclusion: Infliximab achieves more frequent and faster remission rates across IBD subtypes at all time points. This may help guide biologic therapy selection and early treatment decisions in IBD.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134652.04273.bd
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1798 Real-World Comparison of Infliximab and Adalimumab for Remission Induction in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Propensity-Matched Study

Ravneet Kaur, Omar Arman, Laith M. Haj‐Ahmad, Jad Bou-Abdallah et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1798 Real-World Comparison of Infliximab and Adalimumab for Remission Induction in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Propensity-Matched Study

Ravneet Kaur, Omar Arman, Laith M. Haj‐Ahmad, Jad Bou-Abdallah, Mazen Zamzam, Husam Abu Suilik, Himaben Gohil, Noor Arman, Omar Daas, Khaled Rafeh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Infliximab and adalimumab are widely used biologic therapies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). While both are effective, few studies have directly compared their roles in remission induction using biomarker-based objective measures across IBD subtypes. This study evaluates the comparative efficacy of infliximab and adalimumab in achieving biomarker-based remission in IBD patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX data from 93 healthcare organizations. A total of 31,700 adult patients (≥18 years) with IBD treated with infliximab or adalimumab between 2018 and 2023 were initially identified. Propensity score matching was performed to balance age, sex, race/ethnicity, disease severity, and comorbidities, resulting in 13,176 matched IBD patients per treatment group (total n = 26,352). The primary outcome was biomarker-based remission, defined as serum C-reactive protein (CRP) ≤5 mg/L or fecal calprotectin ≤150 µg/g, and assessed at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years. Induction of remission rates and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were reported for the overall IBD cohort and separately for CD and UC subgroups. Results: Infliximab demonstrated consistently higher remission rates than Adalimumab across all time points (P < 0.001). At 6 months, remission was achieved more frequently with Infliximab in IBD (38.8% vs 29.0%), UC (35.3% vs 25.4%), and CD (38.5% vs 28.3%). This pattern was held at 1 year (IBD: 50.4% vs 43.1%; UC: 46.3% vs 37.1%; CD: 49.8% vs 42.6%), 3 years (IBD: 66.6% vs 62.8%; UC: 61.9% vs 55.0%; CD: 66.1% vs 62.7%), and 5 years (IBD: 71.4% vs 68.9%; UC: 65.9% vs 60.0%; CD: 71.2% vs 68.5%). Hazard ratios (HR) were directionally standardized to reflect infliximab over adalimumab (infliximab/adalimumab). Therefore, HR >1 indicates faster remission with Infliximab. Infliximab was associated with a significantly shorter time to remission across all time points in IBD, CD, and UC (all HRs > 1, P < 0.001). Median time to remission was also consistently shorter with Infliximab compared to Adalimumab across all disease groups. This supports the hazard ratio findings and further shows a faster induction of remission with Infliximab. Conclusion: Infliximab achieves more frequent and faster remission rates across IBD subtypes at all time points. This may help guide biologic therapy selection and early treatment decisions in IBD.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.