S5051 Utility of C. difficile Testing

Introduction: Clostridioides difficile is a gram positive, spore forming, and obligate anaerobic bacillus. It causes a severe and contagious form of diarrhea world-wide. It is diagnosed with greater than 3 loose stools in 24 hours. Proton pump inhibitor, immunosuppression, and anti-biotic use can lead to C. difficile. A variety of tests exist, including toxins A and B enzyme immunoassays (EIA) and ELISA. Treatments include oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin. Case Description/Methods: A 40-year-old man with a past history of AAA and H. pylori, who presented to the hospital due to abdominal pain and diarrhea. Symptoms began following completion of H. pylori treatment. A week prior, he presented to the hospital with similar symptoms and computed tomography (CT) abdomen/pelvis showed bowel wall edema. Following discharge, he traveled abroad and still had persistent abdominal pain. Upon return to the USA, he developed foul smelling diarrhea for 7 days, with 7 to 8 loose daily bowel movements. EIA Toxin Antigen Testing results were negative twice. Stool Cultures were negative. Infectious Disease was consulted due to the high clinical suspicion for C. difficile, despite negative testing. Patient was started on oral vancomycin with slow symptom improvement. Due symptom persistence he had a colonoscopy, which showed diffuse pseudomembranes, specifically acute inflammatory exudates with linear configuration of karyorrhectic debris and neutrophils. Biopsy confirmed C. difficile. Discussion: C. difficile testing occurs through rapid EIAs, which is available at most hospitals. EIA sensitivity ranges from 44% to 99% compared to 100% for ELISA testing. As a standalone test, rapid EIAs are inadequate. ACG recommends utilizing a 2 step testing algorithm where GDH or Toxin B PCR is used as a screening test and the Toxin EIA confirms the diagnosis. IDSA recommends diagnosis with NAAT alone or 2- or 3-step testing (GDH immunoassay + toxin assay followed by NAAT only if either the GDH assay and toxin assay, but not both, are negative). If testing remains negative, studies have shown that flexible sigmoidoscopy can be superior to C. difficile cytotoxin test in patients with pseudomembranous colitis. This allows for direct visualization of the colon and biopsies can help rule out C. difficile, IBD, ischemic colitis, or other infectious causes. This case shows how rapid EIA testing delayed diagnosis. Other testing with EIA testing such as ELISA testing or flexible sigmoidoscopy can help confirm C.difficile. If there is high clinical suspicion of C. difficile, treatment should not be delayed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001147664.22156.8a
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S5051 Utility of C. difficile Testing

Mark Bundschuh, David Glass, Maliha Ahmed, Dawood Tahir
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

S5051 Utility of C. difficile Testing

Mark Bundschuh, David Glass, Maliha Ahmed, Dawood Tahir
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Clostridioides difficile is a gram positive, spore forming, and obligate anaerobic bacillus. It causes a severe and contagious form of diarrhea world-wide. It is diagnosed with greater than 3 loose stools in 24 hours. Proton pump inhibitor, immunosuppression, and anti-biotic use can lead to C. difficile. A variety of tests exist, including toxins A and B enzyme immunoassays (EIA) and ELISA. Treatments include oral vancomycin and fidaxomicin. Case Description/Methods: A 40-year-old man with a past history of AAA and H. pylori, who presented to the hospital due to abdominal pain and diarrhea. Symptoms began following completion of H. pylori treatment. A week prior, he presented to the hospital with similar symptoms and computed tomography (CT) abdomen/pelvis showed bowel wall edema. Following discharge, he traveled abroad and still had persistent abdominal pain. Upon return to the USA, he developed foul smelling diarrhea for 7 days, with 7 to 8 loose daily bowel movements. EIA Toxin Antigen Testing results were negative twice. Stool Cultures were negative. Infectious Disease was consulted due to the high clinical suspicion for C. difficile, despite negative testing. Patient was started on oral vancomycin with slow symptom improvement. Due symptom persistence he had a colonoscopy, which showed diffuse pseudomembranes, specifically acute inflammatory exudates with linear configuration of karyorrhectic debris and neutrophils. Biopsy confirmed C. difficile. Discussion: C. difficile testing occurs through rapid EIAs, which is available at most hospitals. EIA sensitivity ranges from 44% to 99% compared to 100% for ELISA testing. As a standalone test, rapid EIAs are inadequate. ACG recommends utilizing a 2 step testing algorithm where GDH or Toxin B PCR is used as a screening test and the Toxin EIA confirms the diagnosis. IDSA recommends diagnosis with NAAT alone or 2- or 3-step testing (GDH immunoassay + toxin assay followed by NAAT only if either the GDH assay and toxin assay, but not both, are negative). If testing remains negative, studies have shown that flexible sigmoidoscopy can be superior to C. difficile cytotoxin test in patients with pseudomembranous colitis. This allows for direct visualization of the colon and biopsies can help rule out C. difficile, IBD, ischemic colitis, or other infectious causes. This case shows how rapid EIA testing delayed diagnosis. Other testing with EIA testing such as ELISA testing or flexible sigmoidoscopy can help confirm C.difficile. If there is high clinical suspicion of C. difficile, treatment should not be delayed.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.