S1855 Demographic Predictors of Bowel Perforation in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A National Cohort Study

Introduction: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, especially ulcerative colitis (UC), are at increased risk for developing bowel perforation. Bowel perforation is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. However, there is a paucity of data regarding risk factors for developing bowel perforations in those admitted with UC. Thus, our study seeks to provide a nationwide inpatient analysis of demographic predictors and disparities associated with risks for developing bowel perforation in patients with UC. Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study using the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Using International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnosis codes, the NIS was queried for adult inpatients with a diagnosis of UC without a concurrent diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare the demographics of patients with and without bowel perforation. A multivariable logistic regression was then performed to identify predictors of bowel perforation. Results: A total of 624,930 patients with UC met inclusion criteria, with 4,985 (0.8%) experiencing a bowel perforation. On bivariate analysis, female patients had lower rates of perforation (0.7% vs 0.9%, P < 0.001). There were significant differences in race (P < 0.001), income (P < 0.001), and insurance (P < 0.001) in those experiencing perforations. On multivariable analysis controlling for demographic factors, female (OR = 0.612, P < 0.001) and Black (OR = 0.592, P < 0.001) patients were at decreased risk for developing perforation. Patients with private insurance were at greater risk than those with Medicare (OR = 1.511, P < 0.001). Clostridioides difficile infection (OR = 1.828, P < 0.001) and chronic steroid use (OR = 1.534, P < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of developing perforations. Conclusion: Demographic disparities, including sex and race, are evident among UC patients who develop bowel perforations. Black patients and female patients are at lower risk for developing perforations compared to their White and male counterparts, respectively. As established in previous studies, Clostridioides difficile infection and chronic steroid use are associated with increased risk for perforation. These findings highlight the presence of racial and gender disparities in healthcare, including the complications of UC. Given that bowel perforation portends poorer outcomes in UC, further research is needed to explore the underlying cause of these disparities and to develop targeted interventions to reduce them.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134880.49236.0f
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1855 Demographic Predictors of Bowel Perforation in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A National Cohort Study

Ahmed Al‐Khazraji, Vraj P. Shah, Amanda Rupert
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1855 Demographic Predictors of Bowel Perforation in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A National Cohort Study

Ahmed Al‐Khazraji, Vraj P. Shah, Amanda Rupert
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, especially ulcerative colitis (UC), are at increased risk for developing bowel perforation. Bowel perforation is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. However, there is a paucity of data regarding risk factors for developing bowel perforations in those admitted with UC. Thus, our study seeks to provide a nationwide inpatient analysis of demographic predictors and disparities associated with risks for developing bowel perforation in patients with UC. Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study using the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Using International Classification of Diseases-10 diagnosis codes, the NIS was queried for adult inpatients with a diagnosis of UC without a concurrent diagnosis of Crohn’s disease. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare the demographics of patients with and without bowel perforation. A multivariable logistic regression was then performed to identify predictors of bowel perforation. Results: A total of 624,930 patients with UC met inclusion criteria, with 4,985 (0.8%) experiencing a bowel perforation. On bivariate analysis, female patients had lower rates of perforation (0.7% vs 0.9%, P < 0.001). There were significant differences in race (P < 0.001), income (P < 0.001), and insurance (P < 0.001) in those experiencing perforations. On multivariable analysis controlling for demographic factors, female (OR = 0.612, P < 0.001) and Black (OR = 0.592, P < 0.001) patients were at decreased risk for developing perforation. Patients with private insurance were at greater risk than those with Medicare (OR = 1.511, P < 0.001). Clostridioides difficile infection (OR = 1.828, P < 0.001) and chronic steroid use (OR = 1.534, P < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of developing perforations. Conclusion: Demographic disparities, including sex and race, are evident among UC patients who develop bowel perforations. Black patients and female patients are at lower risk for developing perforations compared to their White and male counterparts, respectively. As established in previous studies, Clostridioides difficile infection and chronic steroid use are associated with increased risk for perforation. These findings highlight the presence of racial and gender disparities in healthcare, including the complications of UC. Given that bowel perforation portends poorer outcomes in UC, further research is needed to explore the underlying cause of these disparities and to develop targeted interventions to reduce them.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.