S1846 The Dietary Information Needs of Minority Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Introduction: Diet profoundly shapes the lived experiences of people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The lack of evidence for specific diets, however, limits professional support, often resulting in nutrient deficiencies and malnutrition from exclusion diets. Given the dearth of information on cultural diets, Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) with IBD face significant challenges navigating dietary decisions. We aimed to: 1) determine the dietary attitudes and behaviors of BIPOC patients with IBD, 2) identify their unmet dietary information needs, and 3) understand their preferences for dietary information delivery. Methods: We administered a quantitative survey assessing the dietary counseling available for IBD patients ≥18 years. Descriptive statistics and bivariable analyses with Chi-squared tests were performed to identify differences in dietary guidance for BIPOC and non-BIPOC patients. We also conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with BIPOC patients with IBD from Massachusetts General Hospital. A deductive-inductive thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative interviews. Results: Of the 667 who completed the survey, 52 participants identified as BIPOC. Comparing BIPOC and non-BIPOC patients, there was no statistical difference between the frequency of dietary discussions (P = 0.9) and level of comfort discussing diet with their IBD provider (P = 0.3). However, from interviews with BIPOC participants (n = 15), 3 themes emerged regarding the quality of this dietary guidance: psychosocial impact of diet, self-expertise in dietary management, and desired support. Subthemes included the role of food in their lives and IBD management, the sense of burdening others, adopting a trial-and-error approach to dietary decision-making, and advocating for oneself in medical spaces. Participants expressed gaps in the applicability of the dietary information they received with a disconnect between general advice designed for Western/White diets and their diets. Despite the trial-and-error approach, there remained a desire for additional support with interest in patient support groups, integration of cultural diets into counseling, and a centralized location for information. Conclusion: In this mixed methods study, we present nuanced contexts that shape the challenges BIPOC patients with IBD face in accessing and implementing dietary guidance. This study also highlights the need to improve the IBD workforce’s capacity to deliver culturally sensitive and inclusive dietary guidance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134844.59218.47
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1846 The Dietary Information Needs of Minority Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Bharati D. Kochar, Rachel Zhang, Mohamed E. Salama, Seerat Chawla et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

S1846 The Dietary Information Needs of Minority Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Bharati D. Kochar, Rachel Zhang, Mohamed E. Salama, Seerat Chawla, Shaun Walsh, Emily W. Lopes, Ashwin N. Ananthakrishnan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Diet profoundly shapes the lived experiences of people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The lack of evidence for specific diets, however, limits professional support, often resulting in nutrient deficiencies and malnutrition from exclusion diets. Given the dearth of information on cultural diets, Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) with IBD face significant challenges navigating dietary decisions. We aimed to: 1) determine the dietary attitudes and behaviors of BIPOC patients with IBD, 2) identify their unmet dietary information needs, and 3) understand their preferences for dietary information delivery. Methods: We administered a quantitative survey assessing the dietary counseling available for IBD patients ≥18 years. Descriptive statistics and bivariable analyses with Chi-squared tests were performed to identify differences in dietary guidance for BIPOC and non-BIPOC patients. We also conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with BIPOC patients with IBD from Massachusetts General Hospital. A deductive-inductive thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative interviews. Results: Of the 667 who completed the survey, 52 participants identified as BIPOC. Comparing BIPOC and non-BIPOC patients, there was no statistical difference between the frequency of dietary discussions (P = 0.9) and level of comfort discussing diet with their IBD provider (P = 0.3). However, from interviews with BIPOC participants (n = 15), 3 themes emerged regarding the quality of this dietary guidance: psychosocial impact of diet, self-expertise in dietary management, and desired support. Subthemes included the role of food in their lives and IBD management, the sense of burdening others, adopting a trial-and-error approach to dietary decision-making, and advocating for oneself in medical spaces. Participants expressed gaps in the applicability of the dietary information they received with a disconnect between general advice designed for Western/White diets and their diets. Despite the trial-and-error approach, there remained a desire for additional support with interest in patient support groups, integration of cultural diets into counseling, and a centralized location for information. Conclusion: In this mixed methods study, we present nuanced contexts that shape the challenges BIPOC patients with IBD face in accessing and implementing dietary guidance. This study also highlights the need to improve the IBD workforce’s capacity to deliver culturally sensitive and inclusive dietary guidance.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.