Decoding Sustainable Lifestyles: A Comprehensive Analysis of Life-Style Factors and Their Impact on Environmental Sustainability Ratings

As global environmental crises escalate, understanding how individual lifestyle factors affect sustainability outcomes is essential for informing effective interventions with measurable economic and environmental benefits. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 499 participants across urban, suburban, and rural areas. Participants completed measures for 19 variables categorized under six domains: ‎demographics, diet and consumption, transportation and energy use, environmental behaviors, resource usage, and social/physical activities. ‎Transportation mode emerged as the strongest predictor of sustainability. Participants who primarily walked scored significantly higher, with ‎‎84.6% classified as high sustainability performers, compared to only 20% of car users. Diet type also significantly influenced ratings: plant-based diet adherents scored 4.37 on average, with 80.2% rated highly sustainable, versus 2.26 and 28.5% for those consuming animal-based diets. Environmental awareness exhibited a threshold effect; participants with awareness levels 4-5 showed 88% high sustainability, ‎whereas those at levels 1-3 averaged 28%. Six key behaviors, never using plastic, walking, a plant-based diet, limited clothing purchases, ‎renewable energy use, and composting, were associated with average sustainability ratings above 4.3. High-sustainability individuals used ‎‎39.2% less electricity and 36.0% less water than their lower-rated counterparts, representing substantial resource cost savings. Suburban ‎residents demonstrated the highest sustainability rates (67.9%), surpassing urban (47.4%) and rural (46.4%) populations. These findings ‎identify priority areas for promoting sustainable lifestyles and highlight the economic benefits of targeted behavioral interventions through ‎reduced resource consumption and associated cost savings‎.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14419/anxcde52
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Sustainable Lifestyles: A Comprehensive Analysis of Life-Style Factors and Their Impact on Environmental Sustainability Ratings

Ejder Güven, Fatma Gülçin DEMİRCİ, Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu, Ayşe Bilgen et al.
International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Decoding Sustainable Lifestyles: A Comprehensive Analysis of Life-Style Factors and Their Impact on Environmental Sustainability Ratings

Ejder Güven, Fatma Gülçin DEMİRCİ, Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu, Ayşe Bilgen, Turhan Karakaya
article en

Abstract

As global environmental crises escalate, understanding how individual lifestyle factors affect sustainability outcomes is essential for informing effective interventions with measurable economic and environmental benefits. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 499 participants across urban, suburban, and rural areas. Participants completed measures for 19 variables categorized under six domains: ‎demographics, diet and consumption, transportation and energy use, environmental behaviors, resource usage, and social/physical activities. ‎Transportation mode emerged as the strongest predictor of sustainability. Participants who primarily walked scored significantly higher, with ‎‎84.6% classified as high sustainability performers, compared to only 20% of car users. Diet type also significantly influenced ratings: plant-based diet adherents scored 4.37 on average, with 80.2% rated highly sustainable, versus 2.26 and 28.5% for those consuming animal-based diets. Environmental awareness exhibited a threshold effect; participants with awareness levels 4-5 showed 88% high sustainability, ‎whereas those at levels 1-3 averaged 28%. Six key behaviors, never using plastic, walking, a plant-based diet, limited clothing purchases, ‎renewable energy use, and composting, were associated with average sustainability ratings above 4.3. High-sustainability individuals used ‎‎39.2% less electricity and 36.0% less water than their lower-rated counterparts, representing substantial resource cost savings. Suburban ‎residents demonstrated the highest sustainability rates (67.9%), surpassing urban (47.4%) and rural (46.4%) populations. These findings ‎identify priority areas for promoting sustainable lifestyles and highlight the economic benefits of targeted behavioral interventions through ‎reduced resource consumption and associated cost savings‎.

International Journal of Accounting and Economics StudiesVol. 12(8)
Gebze Technical University (TR), Doğuş University (TR), Kocaeli Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.