Addressing the Exception Prioritization Problem in Continuous Auditing Systems With Thresholding

ABSTRACT Continuous auditing research has grappled with the challenge of managing the abundance of detected exceptions in internal audit applications for the past 30 years. A key issue in continuous auditing involves the uncontrolled proliferation of exceptions, where the sheer volume makes manual follow‐up impractical, undermining the viability of the technology. The root cause of this problem is the combination of strong class imbalance and the predominant rule‐based systems design. Prior investigations have attempted ad hoc remedies like introducing additional layers to prioritize the most suspicious exceptions or aggregating data. Currently, there is no universal method to address this prioritization challenge, leaving internal auditors without a means to focus specifically on exceptions most likely to represent genuine faults. Our research explores the origin of this prioritization dilemma and proposes a systems design that can deal appropriately with class imbalance. This solution allows full control of the exception volume by a simple approach in machine learning called thresholding and combined with methods to interpret the output of a continuous auditing system our design effectively focuses the internal auditors' attention on the most significant exceptions. We discuss the implications of thresholding for practice and the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management/Intelligent systems in accounting, finance & management
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.70022
Primary Topic
Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing the Exception Prioritization Problem in Continuous Auditing Systems With Thresholding

Isak Samsten, Peter Öhman, Mats Danielson, Jan Svanberg et al.
Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management/Intelligent systems in accounting, finance & management
Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
article

Addressing the Exception Prioritization Problem in Continuous Auditing Systems With Thresholding

Isak Samsten, Peter Öhman, Mats Danielson, Jan Svanberg, Presha E. Neidermeyer, Tarek Rana
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Continuous auditing research has grappled with the challenge of managing the abundance of detected exceptions in internal audit applications for the past 30 years. A key issue in continuous auditing involves the uncontrolled proliferation of exceptions, where the sheer volume makes manual follow‐up impractical, undermining the viability of the technology. The root cause of this problem is the combination of strong class imbalance and the predominant rule‐based systems design. Prior investigations have attempted ad hoc remedies like introducing additional layers to prioritize the most suspicious exceptions or aggregating data. Currently, there is no universal method to address this prioritization challenge, leaving internal auditors without a means to focus specifically on exceptions most likely to represent genuine faults. Our research explores the origin of this prioritization dilemma and proposes a systems design that can deal appropriately with class imbalance. This solution allows full control of the exception volume by a simple approach in machine learning called thresholding and combined with methods to interpret the output of a continuous auditing system our design effectively focuses the internal auditors' attention on the most significant exceptions. We discuss the implications of thresholding for practice and the literature.

Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management/Intelligent systems in accounting, finance & managementVol. 32(4)
West Virginia University (US), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT), The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), Stockholm University (SE), University of Gävle (SE), Mid Sweden University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.