Birds of a Feather

This exploratory introductory essay has thought about a gender in human-animal or animal sensitive history. It brings into conversation environmental history, natural sciences (ornithology, primatology), feminist science studies and queer ecocriticism. It explores the ways in which our shifting understandings of animals have contoured our understandings of our own species’ gender and sexuality and, vice versa, human heteronormativity and sexism have led us to impose categories on Nature that do not exist. What the other animals get up to and therefore what is understood to be ‘natural’ has a strange power over us. So rethinking what is ‘natural’ has real world impacts. Historically gendered stereotyping, predicated on a misunderstanding of the animal world, is harmful to boys and men as well as for girls and women – and to our understanding of the more-than-human world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Yearbook of Women’s History / Jaarboek voor Vrouwengeschiedenis
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5117/9789048565283_swart
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Birds of a Feather

Sandra Swart
Yearbook of Women’s History / Jaarboek voor Vrouwengeschiedenis
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Birds of a Feather

Sandra Swart
article en

Abstract

This exploratory introductory essay has thought about a gender in human-animal or animal sensitive history. It brings into conversation environmental history, natural sciences (ornithology, primatology), feminist science studies and queer ecocriticism. It explores the ways in which our shifting understandings of animals have contoured our understandings of our own species’ gender and sexuality and, vice versa, human heteronormativity and sexism have led us to impose categories on Nature that do not exist. What the other animals get up to and therefore what is understood to be ‘natural’ has a strange power over us. So rethinking what is ‘natural’ has real world impacts. Historically gendered stereotyping, predicated on a misunderstanding of the animal world, is harmful to boys and men as well as for girls and women – and to our understanding of the more-than-human world.

Yearbook of Women’s History / Jaarboek voor VrouwengeschiedenisVol. 42(2024)
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.