Balancing co-research in policy and practice – insights from a Swedish research council
This study aims to advance understanding of the relationship between policies and practices in public funding of co-research, in view of the ongoing academic reorientation towards a wider and deeper societal engagement – seen as an expression of public sector innovation. Based on a review of three calls by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte), similarities and differences regarding concepts, motives, stakeholders and methods for co-research are distinguished in call texts and applications. The results reveal an ambiguous relationship between co-research policies and practices, with a high compliance among applicants with the calls’ request for co-research but with little guidance on how to esteem, prioritize, design and conduct co-research. This complicates the balancing act between the co-existing rationales of academic freedom and public interest in public research funding as part of the two-directional relationship between innovative institutions, processes and solutions in public sector innovation.
Authors
- Annelie J. Sundler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9194-3244)
- Anna Tengqvist
- Malin Lindberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4501-2542)
Institutions
- Malmö University (SE)
- Röda Korsets Högskola (SE)
- University of Borås (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nordic Journal of Innovation in the Public Sector
- Published
- 2025-12-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.18261/njips.4.1.3
- Primary Topic
- Innovation Policy and R&D
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Malmö Högskola
- Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd