Balancing co-research in policy and practice – insights from a Swedish research council

This study aims to advance understanding of the relationship between policies and practices in public funding of co-research, in view of the ongoing academic reorientation towards a wider and deeper societal engagement – seen as an expression of public sector innovation. Based on a review of three calls by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte), similarities and differences regarding concepts, motives, stakeholders and methods for co-research are distinguished in call texts and applications. The results reveal an ambiguous relationship between co-research policies and practices, with a high compliance among applicants with the calls’ request for co-research but with little guidance on how to esteem, prioritize, design and conduct co-research. This complicates the balancing act between the co-existing rationales of academic freedom and public interest in public research funding as part of the two-directional relationship between innovative institutions, processes and solutions in public sector innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nordic Journal of Innovation in the Public Sector
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18261/njips.4.1.3
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing co-research in policy and practice – insights from a Swedish research council

Annelie J. Sundler, Anna Tengqvist, Malin Lindberg
Nordic Journal of Innovation in the Public Sector
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

Balancing co-research in policy and practice – insights from a Swedish research council

Annelie J. Sundler, Anna Tengqvist, Malin Lindberg
article en

Abstract

This study aims to advance understanding of the relationship between policies and practices in public funding of co-research, in view of the ongoing academic reorientation towards a wider and deeper societal engagement – seen as an expression of public sector innovation. Based on a review of three calls by the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (Forte), similarities and differences regarding concepts, motives, stakeholders and methods for co-research are distinguished in call texts and applications. The results reveal an ambiguous relationship between co-research policies and practices, with a high compliance among applicants with the calls’ request for co-research but with little guidance on how to esteem, prioritize, design and conduct co-research. This complicates the balancing act between the co-existing rationales of academic freedom and public interest in public research funding as part of the two-directional relationship between innovative institutions, processes and solutions in public sector innovation.

Nordic Journal of Innovation in the Public SectorVol. 4(1)
Malmö University (SE), Röda Korsets Högskola (SE), University of Borås (SE)
Vetenskapsrådet, Malmö Högskola, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.