Stoichiometry model identification for homogeneous reaction mixture: High‐dimension and missing measurement case studies

Abstract We address the identification of the actual stoichiometric network in reacting systems using composition measurements, extending our previous work (Fromer et al. I&ECR 2023). We generalize this algorithm for scenarios where not all species are measured and back‐calculate the missing concentrations through the reaction extents of the candidate network. In addition to the prior global accuracy comparison among candidate reaction networks, we introduce a species‐by‐species F ‐test accuracy comparison between the most accurate reaction networks from the global assessment. We examine two case studies involving 7 and 11 species participate in 4 or 8 reactions, respectively. In the second case study, the 8 reactions are linearly dependent, presenting an additional challenge. The enhanced algorithm successfully identifies the actual reaction network as the most accurate, even with 4 of the 11 species not measured.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIChE Journal
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.70183
Primary Topic
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stoichiometry model identification for homogeneous reaction mixture: High‐dimension and missing measurement case studies

A. Lawrence Gould, Christos Georgakis, Yachao Dong, Yafeng Xing
AIChE Journal
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
article

Stoichiometry model identification for homogeneous reaction mixture: High‐dimension and missing measurement case studies

A. Lawrence Gould, Christos Georgakis, Yachao Dong, Yafeng Xing
article en

Abstract

Abstract We address the identification of the actual stoichiometric network in reacting systems using composition measurements, extending our previous work (Fromer et al. I&ECR 2023). We generalize this algorithm for scenarios where not all species are measured and back‐calculate the missing concentrations through the reaction extents of the candidate network. In addition to the prior global accuracy comparison among candidate reaction networks, we introduce a species‐by‐species F ‐test accuracy comparison between the most accurate reaction networks from the global assessment. We examine two case studies involving 7 and 11 species participate in 4 or 8 reactions, respectively. In the second case study, the 8 reactions are linearly dependent, presenting an additional challenge. The enhanced algorithm successfully identifies the actual reaction network as the most accurate, even with 4 of the 11 species not measured.

AIChE JournalVol. 72(3)
Tufts University (US), Dalian University of Technology (CN), Fuzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.