Visualizing Qualitative Research

ABSTRACT Although qualitative research is typically seen as working with verbal text, visual representations are frequently used in qualitative research in our field. This paper examines visualization as a research practice, aiming to encourage its reflective use and further development. We contribute to the literature on qualitative research in public administration, first, by discussing key concepts and the work visuals do. Second, we explore the way visualization can enrich the research process by shaping interactions within texts and with audiences. Third, we connect the practice of visualizing to the dialogue on methodological understandings and traditions in our field. For this, we outlined two distinct approaches to visualizing that researchers may draw upon: an iterative‐progression approach (inductive) and a pragmatic‐bricolage approach (abductive). We conclude by connecting visualization to thick description, suggesting how visuals can add layers of meaning in qualitative public administration research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Review
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70064
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visualizing Qualitative Research

Merlijn van Hulst, E. Lianne Visser
1 citations
Public Administration Review
Participatory Visual Research Methods
4.20
article

Visualizing Qualitative Research

Merlijn van Hulst, E. Lianne Visser
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although qualitative research is typically seen as working with verbal text, visual representations are frequently used in qualitative research in our field. This paper examines visualization as a research practice, aiming to encourage its reflective use and further development. We contribute to the literature on qualitative research in public administration, first, by discussing key concepts and the work visuals do. Second, we explore the way visualization can enrich the research process by shaping interactions within texts and with audiences. Third, we connect the practice of visualizing to the dialogue on methodological understandings and traditions in our field. For this, we outlined two distinct approaches to visualizing that researchers may draw upon: an iterative‐progression approach (inductive) and a pragmatic‐bricolage approach (abductive). We conclude by connecting visualization to thick description, suggesting how visuals can add layers of meaning in qualitative public administration research.

Public Administration Review
Tilburg University (NL), Gemeente Den Haag (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Visualizing Qualitative Research — Merlijn van Hulst, E. Lianne Visser · Public Administration Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS