A History of American Legal Barriers to Gender-Affirming Care

The last 5 years in the United States have witnessed a flurry of policies attempting to limit access to gender-affirming care (GAC), with state and federal authorities instituting restrictions on care for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) adolescents and attempting to limit funding for treatment costs. Although many have decried these policies as an unprecedented assault on GAC, there is actually a long history of attempts to limit access to GAC in the United States through the creation of restrictive policies directed at patients, clinicians, and payers. Even amid such restrictions, TGD people have demonstrated a remarkable ability to access GAC, often finding new ways to obtain this care. These have included shifts in tactics deployed by advocates of GAC as hostile policymakers attempted to limit the expansion of access. The current landscape of restrictive policies represents the culmination of a longstanding regulatory evolution, integrating various legislative approaches that have been used over almost a century. This article discusses how TGD communities have navigated several iterations of hostile legislative environments to access such care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7326/annals-25-03515
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A History of American Legal Barriers to Gender-Affirming Care

Thomas M. Freitag
Annals of Internal Medicine
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

A History of American Legal Barriers to Gender-Affirming Care

Thomas M. Freitag
article en

Abstract

The last 5 years in the United States have witnessed a flurry of policies attempting to limit access to gender-affirming care (GAC), with state and federal authorities instituting restrictions on care for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) adolescents and attempting to limit funding for treatment costs. Although many have decried these policies as an unprecedented assault on GAC, there is actually a long history of attempts to limit access to GAC in the United States through the creation of restrictive policies directed at patients, clinicians, and payers. Even amid such restrictions, TGD people have demonstrated a remarkable ability to access GAC, often finding new ways to obtain this care. These have included shifts in tactics deployed by advocates of GAC as hostile policymakers attempted to limit the expansion of access. The current landscape of restrictive policies represents the culmination of a longstanding regulatory evolution, integrating various legislative approaches that have been used over almost a century. This article discusses how TGD communities have navigated several iterations of hostile legislative environments to access such care.

Annals of Internal MedicineVol. 179(2)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Behavioral Pharma (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.