Influence of foot orthoses on bone alignment parameters of the foot: a cadaveric weight-bearing CT study

Given the inconclusive evidence regarding the effects of foot orthoses in flatfoot management, this study aimed to assess the impact of two distinct types of foot orthoses on three-dimensional bone alignment of the foot using advanced imaging techniques. Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaveric feet showing radiological signs of progressive collapsing foot deformity were collected. Two different types of foot orthoses, type I with medial support and lateral counter-support and type II with an additional metatarsal pad, were custom-made. The feet were loaded using a testing machine and scanned by weight-bearing computed tomography. Semi-automatic 3D models of bone dimensions and axes were generated to compute the foot alignment. This study was designed according to the QUACS scale. The sagittal talus-first metatarsal angle was corrected by an average of 2.0±3.0 degrees with type I orthoses (p = 0.019), and 2.6±3.7 degrees with type II orthoses (p = 0.018). The axial talocalcaneal angle was corrected by an average 1.8±2.8 degrees with type I orthoses (p = 0.021), and 2.0±3.1 degrees with type II orthoses (p = 0.02). The axial talus-first metatarsal angle was corrected by an average 1.3±2.0 degrees with type I orthoses (p = 0.024), while type II orthoses caused no significant effect (p = 0.297). No significant differences were found between type I and type II orthoses (all p > 0.05). In this cadaveric study, foot orthoses with medial support, with or without a metatarsal pad, improved all angles tested, but the effect appeared to be small. It remains to be determined whether these subtle changes are responsible for the positive clinical effects described in other studies, or whether orthoses have a positive effect even without reaching the intended alignment correction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-06124-z
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of foot orthoses on bone alignment parameters of the foot: a cadaveric weight-bearing CT study

Michael E. Hahn, Alexander Simon, Carsten Schlickewei, Tanja Spethmann et al.
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Influence of foot orthoses on bone alignment parameters of the foot: a cadaveric weight-bearing CT study

Michael E. Hahn, Alexander Simon, Carsten Schlickewei, Tanja Spethmann, Leon-Gordian Leonhardt, Tim Rolvien, Lara Krüger, Frank Timo Beil, Eva Goedecke
article en

Abstract

Given the inconclusive evidence regarding the effects of foot orthoses in flatfoot management, this study aimed to assess the impact of two distinct types of foot orthoses on three-dimensional bone alignment of the foot using advanced imaging techniques. Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaveric feet showing radiological signs of progressive collapsing foot deformity were collected. Two different types of foot orthoses, type I with medial support and lateral counter-support and type II with an additional metatarsal pad, were custom-made. The feet were loaded using a testing machine and scanned by weight-bearing computed tomography. Semi-automatic 3D models of bone dimensions and axes were generated to compute the foot alignment. This study was designed according to the QUACS scale. The sagittal talus-first metatarsal angle was corrected by an average of 2.0±3.0 degrees with type I orthoses (p = 0.019), and 2.6±3.7 degrees with type II orthoses (p = 0.018). The axial talocalcaneal angle was corrected by an average 1.8±2.8 degrees with type I orthoses (p = 0.021), and 2.0±3.1 degrees with type II orthoses (p = 0.02). The axial talus-first metatarsal angle was corrected by an average 1.3±2.0 degrees with type I orthoses (p = 0.024), while type II orthoses caused no significant effect (p = 0.297). No significant differences were found between type I and type II orthoses (all p > 0.05). In this cadaveric study, foot orthoses with medial support, with or without a metatarsal pad, improved all angles tested, but the effect appeared to be small. It remains to be determined whether these subtle changes are responsible for the positive clinical effects described in other studies, or whether orthoses have a positive effect even without reaching the intended alignment correction.

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryVol. 146(1)
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Helios Endo-Klinik Hamburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.