Assessing the Quality of Narrative Feedback in Entrustable Professional Activities Using the EFeCT Feedback Scoring Tool

Overall, the majority of EPA narratives provided moderate to high-quality feedback to students. However, variability was evident, and many EPA narratives were missing one or more elements of high-quality feedback. This could result in significant implications for learner development. Addressing contextual factors such as clinical workload and creating faculty development opportunities may support faculty in providing high-quality narrative feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Clinical Teacher
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.70295
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Quality of Narrative Feedback in Entrustable Professional Activities Using the EFeCT Feedback Scoring Tool

Deena M. Hamza, William Gibson, Neil Dhami, Anna Oswald et al.
The Clinical Teacher
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Assessing the Quality of Narrative Feedback in Entrustable Professional Activities Using the EFeCT Feedback Scoring Tool

Deena M. Hamza, William Gibson, Neil Dhami, Anna Oswald, Rebecca Lee, Mandy Moffat
article en

Abstract

Overall, the majority of EPA narratives provided moderate to high-quality feedback to students. However, variability was evident, and many EPA narratives were missing one or more elements of high-quality feedback. This could result in significant implications for learner development. Addressing contextual factors such as clinical workload and creating faculty development opportunities may support faculty in providing high-quality narrative feedback.

The Clinical TeacherVol. 23(1)
University of Dundee (GB), Alberta Hospital Edmonton (CA), University of Alberta Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.