A new measure of causality orientations: Development and validation in the sport context

According to the Self-Determination Theory, causality orientations are stable motivational individual differences that shape how athletes interpret and act upon key features of their sport environment, such as coach feedback, practice structure, or competitive demands. These orientations influence athletes' participation, motivation, and their sport experience. However, there is currently no specific instrument for sport that assesses causality orientations. The objective of this article was to develop and validate the Sport Causality Orientations Scale (SCOS). In Study 1, academic experts created an initial pool of items based on previous literature and athlete feedback, forming a preliminary version. This version was administered to adolescents. To ensure an optimal fit of the scale, a stepwise reduction of situations was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis. In Study 2, the final version of the scale was administered to a larger sample in conjunction with the Sport Enjoyment Scale, demonstrating factorial and convergent validity, internal consistency, and satisfactory measurement invariance across sex and adolescent developmental stages. In conclusion, this study provides initial evidence suggesting that the SCOS is a valid and useful instrument for measuring causality orientations (autonomy, controlled and impersonal) in the sport context and for exploring their implications for a positive sport experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2598156
Primary Topic
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new measure of causality orientations: Development and validation in the sport context

Mauro Pérez-Gaido, Vanina Schmidt, Octavio Álvarez, María Fernanda Molina et al.
Journal of Sports Sciences
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
article

A new measure of causality orientations: Development and validation in the sport context

Mauro Pérez-Gaido, Vanina Schmidt, Octavio Álvarez, María Fernanda Molina, Isabel Castillo, María Julia Raimundi
article en

Abstract

According to the Self-Determination Theory, causality orientations are stable motivational individual differences that shape how athletes interpret and act upon key features of their sport environment, such as coach feedback, practice structure, or competitive demands. These orientations influence athletes' participation, motivation, and their sport experience. However, there is currently no specific instrument for sport that assesses causality orientations. The objective of this article was to develop and validate the Sport Causality Orientations Scale (SCOS). In Study 1, academic experts created an initial pool of items based on previous literature and athlete feedback, forming a preliminary version. This version was administered to adolescents. To ensure an optimal fit of the scale, a stepwise reduction of situations was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis. In Study 2, the final version of the scale was administered to a larger sample in conjunction with the Sport Enjoyment Scale, demonstrating factorial and convergent validity, internal consistency, and satisfactory measurement invariance across sex and adolescent developmental stages. In conclusion, this study provides initial evidence suggesting that the SCOS is a valid and useful instrument for measuring causality orientations (autonomy, controlled and impersonal) in the sport context and for exploring their implications for a positive sport experience.

Journal of Sports SciencesVol. 44(5)
Universitat de València (ES), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), National University of Tres de Febrero (AR), National Research Council (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.