Reproducibility of Rate of Perceived Exertion–Based Self-Selected Running Speeds on Indoor Track and Treadmill Conditions in Recreational Runners

Nguyen, AP, Kisita, V, Van Cant, J, Monnet, T, and Bosquet, L. Reproducibility of rate of perceived exertion-based self-selected running speeds on indoor track and treadmill conditions in recreational runners. J Strength Cond Res 40(2): e125-e130, 2026-This study evaluates the reproducibility of self-selected speeds at a rate of perceived exertion (RPE) of 3/10 in both track and treadmill conditions. It also investigates the differences between 2 conditions: i.e., track versus treadmill and 2 RPE instructions, i.e., 3/10 and 8/10. In addition, it compares spatiotemporal parameters across conditions and RPE levels. Fifty-five recreational runners completed six 1-km runs under randomized conditions: 4 at 3/10 and 2 at 8/10 RPE on both track and treadmill. Spatiotemporal parameters, heart rate, and self-selected speeds were recorded. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement ( SEM ), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Statistical significance for all tests was set at α = 0.05. Self-selected speeds showed excellent reliability on both surfaces (ICC = 0.93-0.97). The track showed lower SEM (0.3 km·h -1 ) and MDC (0.7 km·h -1 ) values compared with the treadmill ( SEM : 0.6 km·h -1 ; MDC: 1.6 km·h -1 ). Speeds were 20% slower at 3/10 RPE and 10% slower at 8/10 RPE on the treadmill. Treadmill running exhibited longer contact times (+13%), shorter flight times (-35%), and shorter step lengths (-6%) at 3/10 RPE, with similar trends observed at 8/10 RPE. Rate of perceived exertion appears to be a reliable and practical tool for monitoring and prescribing running intensity levels. The slower treadmill speeds at comparable RPE levels may help reduce biomechanical loading on the lower limb joints, offering advantages for rehabilitation. However, differences in biomechanics and perceived effort between treadmill and track running highlight the need for context-specific applications in training and rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005293
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproducibility of Rate of Perceived Exertion–Based Self-Selected Running Speeds on Indoor Track and Treadmill Conditions in Recreational Runners

Joachim Van Cant, Anh Phong Nguyen, Laurent Bosquet, Tony Monnet et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Reproducibility of Rate of Perceived Exertion–Based Self-Selected Running Speeds on Indoor Track and Treadmill Conditions in Recreational Runners

Joachim Van Cant, Anh Phong Nguyen, Laurent Bosquet, Tony Monnet, Victor Kisita
article en

Abstract

Nguyen, AP, Kisita, V, Van Cant, J, Monnet, T, and Bosquet, L. Reproducibility of rate of perceived exertion-based self-selected running speeds on indoor track and treadmill conditions in recreational runners. J Strength Cond Res 40(2): e125-e130, 2026-This study evaluates the reproducibility of self-selected speeds at a rate of perceived exertion (RPE) of 3/10 in both track and treadmill conditions. It also investigates the differences between 2 conditions: i.e., track versus treadmill and 2 RPE instructions, i.e., 3/10 and 8/10. In addition, it compares spatiotemporal parameters across conditions and RPE levels. Fifty-five recreational runners completed six 1-km runs under randomized conditions: 4 at 3/10 and 2 at 8/10 RPE on both track and treadmill. Spatiotemporal parameters, heart rate, and self-selected speeds were recorded. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement ( SEM ), and minimal detectable change (MDC). Statistical significance for all tests was set at α = 0.05. Self-selected speeds showed excellent reliability on both surfaces (ICC = 0.93-0.97). The track showed lower SEM (0.3 km·h -1 ) and MDC (0.7 km·h -1 ) values compared with the treadmill ( SEM : 0.6 km·h -1 ; MDC: 1.6 km·h -1 ). Speeds were 20% slower at 3/10 RPE and 10% slower at 8/10 RPE on the treadmill. Treadmill running exhibited longer contact times (+13%), shorter flight times (-35%), and shorter step lengths (-6%) at 3/10 RPE, with similar trends observed at 8/10 RPE. Rate of perceived exertion appears to be a reliable and practical tool for monitoring and prescribing running intensity levels. The slower treadmill speeds at comparable RPE levels may help reduce biomechanical loading on the lower limb joints, offering advantages for rehabilitation. However, differences in biomechanics and perceived effort between treadmill and track running highlight the need for context-specific applications in training and rehabilitation.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning ResearchVol. 40(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut Pprime (FR), Université de Poitiers (FR), Pain in Motion (BE), Running Injury Clinic (CA), UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.