Achieving Efficiency in Full Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective Learning-Curve Cumulative Summation Analysis and Its Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background and objective Full endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression is increasingly being adopted for lumbar spinal stenosis, yet the learning curve and its clinical consequences remain uncertain. In this study, we aimed to prospectively evaluate a single surgeon's learning curve for full endoscopic interlaminar decompression. Methods We conducted a prospective, single-surgeon cohort (2018-2023) involving adults who underwent single-level full endoscopic interlaminar decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Operative efficiency was prespecified as operative time ≤90 minutes. Learning-curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) was applied to detect the transition from inadequate to adequate performance; competency was declared at the first boundary crossing. Patient-reported outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores collected at baseline and at one, three, six, and 12 months. Safety endpoints included major complications and reoperations. Results A total of 77 patients were included (mean follow-up period: 47 months). LC-CUSUM signaled efficiency competency at case 44. Mean operative time was 98.6 ± 29.0 minutes overall; 111.2 ± 32.0 minutes in the early phase group (cases 1-44) and 81.7 ± 10.1 minutes in the late phase group (cases 45-77). Both groups demonstrated significant within-group improvements in ODI and VAS at each postoperative time point; however, the magnitude of improvement did not differ between phases. Major complications (1/44 early vs. 0/33 late) and reoperations (3/44 vs 2/33) were comparable. All patients were discharged within 24 hours. Conclusions Efficiency competency was achieved without compromising patient‑reported outcomes or safety across the learning curve.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98634
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Achieving Efficiency in Full Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective Learning-Curve Cumulative Summation Analysis and Its Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes

José Maximino Costa, Antônio Chaves de Assís Neto, José Carlos Machado, Paulo Santos et al.
Cureus
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Achieving Efficiency in Full Endoscopic Interlaminar Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective Learning-Curve Cumulative Summation Analysis and Its Impact on Patient-Reported Outcomes

José Maximino Costa, Antônio Chaves de Assís Neto, José Carlos Machado, Paulo Santos, Patrícia Martins, Nuno Bastos, Leonor Rocha, Ricardo Vila Real
article en

Abstract

Background and objective Full endoscopic interlaminar lumbar decompression is increasingly being adopted for lumbar spinal stenosis, yet the learning curve and its clinical consequences remain uncertain. In this study, we aimed to prospectively evaluate a single surgeon's learning curve for full endoscopic interlaminar decompression. Methods We conducted a prospective, single-surgeon cohort (2018-2023) involving adults who underwent single-level full endoscopic interlaminar decompression for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Operative efficiency was prespecified as operative time ≤90 minutes. Learning-curve cumulative summation (LC-CUSUM) was applied to detect the transition from inadequate to adequate performance; competency was declared at the first boundary crossing. Patient-reported outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores collected at baseline and at one, three, six, and 12 months. Safety endpoints included major complications and reoperations. Results A total of 77 patients were included (mean follow-up period: 47 months). LC-CUSUM signaled efficiency competency at case 44. Mean operative time was 98.6 ± 29.0 minutes overall; 111.2 ± 32.0 minutes in the early phase group (cases 1-44) and 81.7 ± 10.1 minutes in the late phase group (cases 45-77). Both groups demonstrated significant within-group improvements in ODI and VAS at each postoperative time point; however, the magnitude of improvement did not differ between phases. Major complications (1/44 early vs. 0/33 late) and reoperations (3/44 vs 2/33) were comparable. All patients were discharged within 24 hours. Conclusions Efficiency competency was achieved without compromising patient‑reported outcomes or safety across the learning curve.

CureusVol. 17(12)
Hospital Pedro Hispano (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.