Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the ENRICh scale for Chinese infertile patients: a methodological and cross-sectional study

The use of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) for infertility treatment imposes a substantial financial strain on patients. However, there is a scarcity of research specifically addressing financial toxicity related to ART. This study adapted and validated the Chinese version of the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) scale to assess financial toxicity among infertile couples undergoing ART in China. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 570 infertile patients from five hospitals in China. Its psychometric properties were assessed using exploratory factor analyses, confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity. The scale demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.90; McDonald’s Ω = 0.94) and a good factor structure (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.89). The results identified two distinct factors: “financially affected” and “financially coping”. It showed good convergent validity with the COST and medical expenses. ENRICh promising psychometric properties provide valuable insights for policymakers to address the treatment affordability challenges that may be exacerbated by China’s pronatalist policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-25530-x
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the ENRICh scale for Chinese infertile patients: a methodological and cross-sectional study

Hongwei Nie, Cai Xu, Mingzhu Su, Hongbin Cong et al.
BMC Public Health
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the ENRICh scale for Chinese infertile patients: a methodological and cross-sectional study

Hongwei Nie, Cai Xu, Mingzhu Su, Hongbin Cong, Chaofan Li, Yujia Feng
article en

Abstract

The use of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) for infertility treatment imposes a substantial financial strain on patients. However, there is a scarcity of research specifically addressing financial toxicity related to ART. This study adapted and validated the Chinese version of the Economic Strain and Resilience in Cancer (ENRICh) scale to assess financial toxicity among infertile couples undergoing ART in China. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 570 infertile patients from five hospitals in China. Its psychometric properties were assessed using exploratory factor analyses, confirmatory factor analyses, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and convergent/discriminant validity. The scale demonstrated strong psychometric properties, including excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.90; McDonald’s Ω = 0.94) and a good factor structure (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin = 0.89). The results identified two distinct factors: “financially affected” and “financially coping”. It showed good convergent validity with the COST and medical expenses. ENRICh promising psychometric properties provide valuable insights for policymakers to address the treatment affordability challenges that may be exacerbated by China’s pronatalist policies.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Shandong University (CN), Shandong Management University (CN), Ohio University (US), State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.