Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Nonsurgical Management for Extruded or Sequestrated Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the clinical efficacies of endoscopic surgery and nonsurgical treatment in patients with extruded or sequestered lumbar disc herniation (LDH).Population613 patients with extruded or sequestrated LDH were included (endoscopic: n = 276; nonsurgical: n = 337).MethodsPatients received either endoscopic discectomy or structured nonsurgical management. Longitudinal VAS and ODI trajectories were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Return to work (RTW) outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Spearman correlation was used to assess the association between resorption and symptom improvement.ResultsBoth cohorts had comparable sex, BMI, and herniation levels (<i>P</i> > .05), but differed in age (<i>P</i> < .001), which did not influence outcomes after adjustment. VAS and ODI improved in both groups over time (<i>P</i> < .001). Endoscopic discectomy provided faster symptom relief within 6 months (<i>P</i> < .001), whereas mid to long-term outcomes were comparable between groups (<i>P</i> > .05). Disc resorption occurred in 58.2% of nonsurgical patients (median time 6.9 months). Resorption was correlated with greater improvements in ODI and VAS (<i>P</i> < .05). Surgical complications included transient neurological deficits (17.4%), dural tears (1.1%), and epidural hematomas (0.7%). Postoperative recurrence occurred in 8.3% of patients. RTW time was unaffected by treatment, sex, BMI, or herniation level (<i>P</i> > .05), but was influenced by age (HR = 0.948, <i>P</i> < .001) and occupational demands (HR = 0.697, <i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionsEndoscopic discectomy provides faster early pain and functional improvement (≤6 months), while nonsurgical management achieves comparable outcomes thereafter. Disc resorption contributes to symptom recovery. RTW time is determined primarily by age and occupational demands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251408374
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Nonsurgical Management for Extruded or Sequestrated Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Xiaorong Li, Zihua Tang, Hongwei� Jiang, Zihang Li et al.
Global Spine Journal
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Nonsurgical Management for Extruded or Sequestrated Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Xiaorong Li, Zihua Tang, Hongwei� Jiang, Zihang Li, Kaiyang Xu, Yuxiang Dai, Yucheng Wang, Jintao Liu, Zhijia Ma, Pengfei Yu
article en

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the clinical efficacies of endoscopic surgery and nonsurgical treatment in patients with extruded or sequestered lumbar disc herniation (LDH).Population613 patients with extruded or sequestrated LDH were included (endoscopic: n = 276; nonsurgical: n = 337).MethodsPatients received either endoscopic discectomy or structured nonsurgical management. Longitudinal VAS and ODI trajectories were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Return to work (RTW) outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Spearman correlation was used to assess the association between resorption and symptom improvement.ResultsBoth cohorts had comparable sex, BMI, and herniation levels (<i>P</i> > .05), but differed in age (<i>P</i> < .001), which did not influence outcomes after adjustment. VAS and ODI improved in both groups over time (<i>P</i> < .001). Endoscopic discectomy provided faster symptom relief within 6 months (<i>P</i> < .001), whereas mid to long-term outcomes were comparable between groups (<i>P</i> > .05). Disc resorption occurred in 58.2% of nonsurgical patients (median time 6.9 months). Resorption was correlated with greater improvements in ODI and VAS (<i>P</i> < .05). Surgical complications included transient neurological deficits (17.4%), dural tears (1.1%), and epidural hematomas (0.7%). Postoperative recurrence occurred in 8.3% of patients. RTW time was unaffected by treatment, sex, BMI, or herniation level (<i>P</i> > .05), but was influenced by age (HR = 0.948, <i>P</i> < .001) and occupational demands (HR = 0.697, <i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionsEndoscopic discectomy provides faster early pain and functional improvement (≤6 months), while nonsurgical management achieves comparable outcomes thereafter. Disc resorption contributes to symptom recovery. RTW time is determined primarily by age and occupational demands.

Global Spine Journal
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Soochow University (CN), Suzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital (CN), CM Hospital (KR), First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.