GENDER EQUALITY POLICIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND KAZAKHSTAN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Kazakhstan has made significant progress in institutionalizing gender equality. However, there are still existing challenges, including the gender pay gap, women’s underrepresentation in leadership positions, and gender-based violence. This study aims to compare selected gender equality policy documents of the European Union and Kazakhstan to identify patterns, similarities, and differences. The study applied thematic analysis across three predefined categories: terminology and definitions, quotas and support measures, and conflict resolution mechanisms in the labor sector. The findings showed that the EU policy has comprehensive gender-related definitions, a legally binding framework for gender equality advancement, and a high level of interdepartmental cooperation. At the same time, the analysis of Kazakhstani documents revealed significant gaps in terminology, the absence of gender-specific quotas for women, and the conflation of gender equality policy and family and demographic issues. Based on the study’s findings, key recommendations for improving gender equality policy in Kazakhstan were developed, including the introduction of precise and legally binding definitions related to gender equality, the establishment of a separate institution responsible for gender equality, and the implementation of quotas for women to strengthen their representation in leadership positions. The results contribute to the development of comparative research in Central Asia and provide practical recommendations for policymakers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Central Asian Studies
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52536/3006-807x.2025-4.006
Primary Topic
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GENDER EQUALITY POLICIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND KAZAKHSTAN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Gaziza Akhmetchina
Journal of Central Asian Studies
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
article

GENDER EQUALITY POLICIES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND KAZAKHSTAN: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Gaziza Akhmetchina
article en

Abstract

Kazakhstan has made significant progress in institutionalizing gender equality. However, there are still existing challenges, including the gender pay gap, women’s underrepresentation in leadership positions, and gender-based violence. This study aims to compare selected gender equality policy documents of the European Union and Kazakhstan to identify patterns, similarities, and differences. The study applied thematic analysis across three predefined categories: terminology and definitions, quotas and support measures, and conflict resolution mechanisms in the labor sector. The findings showed that the EU policy has comprehensive gender-related definitions, a legally binding framework for gender equality advancement, and a high level of interdepartmental cooperation. At the same time, the analysis of Kazakhstani documents revealed significant gaps in terminology, the absence of gender-specific quotas for women, and the conflation of gender equality policy and family and demographic issues. Based on the study’s findings, key recommendations for improving gender equality policy in Kazakhstan were developed, including the introduction of precise and legally binding definitions related to gender equality, the establishment of a separate institution responsible for gender equality, and the implementation of quotas for women to strengthen their representation in leadership positions. The results contribute to the development of comparative research in Central Asia and provide practical recommendations for policymakers.

Journal of Central Asian StudiesVol. 23(4)
Maqsut Narikbayev University (KZ), Nazarbayev University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.