Wind dataset assessment and energy estimation for potential future offshore wind farm development areas on the Scotian Shelf

Abstract. The Scotian Shelf is one of the top wind regions in the world. To assess the wind energy potential on the shelf, in this study we first assessed the uncertainties of four commonly used wind datasets – ERA5, CFSv2, NARR, and HRDPS – by comparing them against observational wind data from both nearshore and offshore sites. The assessment showed that the root mean square error (RMSE) of the datasets ranged from 1.6 to 2.4 m s−1 in wind speed and from 24.6 to 36.4° in wind direction. HRDPS performed best at the nearshore sites, while ERA5 was more accurate at the offshore sites. We then estimated the wind energy potential of six potential future development areas (PFDAs) on the shelf using ERA5. The estimates showed that wind energy varied seasonally, with summer wind energy production being 34 %–40 % lower than in winter. The uncertainties in wind datasets amplified the variation in wind energy production by up to 28 % in winter and 50 % in summer. The energy output was sensitive to turbine spacing due to wind wakes, which reduced energy production by 19 %–30 % in winter and 37 %–46 % in summer, depending on the configuration of wind speeds, wind directions, and the specific layout of the wind farms. This strong variation in wind energy output suggests that a more feasible operational method should be used to balance energy production and usage.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Wind energy science
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-10-2965-2025
Primary Topic
Wind Energy Research and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wind dataset assessment and energy estimation for potential future offshore wind farm development areas on the Scotian Shelf

Yongxing Ma, Brent Law, Marc A. Skinner, Ryan R. E. Stanley et al.
Wind energy science
Wind Energy Research and Development
article

Wind dataset assessment and energy estimation for potential future offshore wind farm development areas on the Scotian Shelf

Yongxing Ma, Brent Law, Marc A. Skinner, Ryan R. E. Stanley, Yongsheng Wu, Michael Z. Li, Jinshan Xu
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The Scotian Shelf is one of the top wind regions in the world. To assess the wind energy potential on the shelf, in this study we first assessed the uncertainties of four commonly used wind datasets – ERA5, CFSv2, NARR, and HRDPS – by comparing them against observational wind data from both nearshore and offshore sites. The assessment showed that the root mean square error (RMSE) of the datasets ranged from 1.6 to 2.4 m s−1 in wind speed and from 24.6 to 36.4° in wind direction. HRDPS performed best at the nearshore sites, while ERA5 was more accurate at the offshore sites. We then estimated the wind energy potential of six potential future development areas (PFDAs) on the shelf using ERA5. The estimates showed that wind energy varied seasonally, with summer wind energy production being 34 %–40 % lower than in winter. The uncertainties in wind datasets amplified the variation in wind energy production by up to 28 % in winter and 50 % in summer. The energy output was sensitive to turbine spacing due to wind wakes, which reduced energy production by 19 %–30 % in winter and 37 %–46 % in summer, depending on the configuration of wind speeds, wind directions, and the specific layout of the wind farms. This strong variation in wind energy output suggests that a more feasible operational method should be used to balance energy production and usage.

Wind energy scienceVol. 10(12)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Wind Energy Research and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.