Responsible research and innovation of carbon removal: strategies for field trials

Demonstrating methods for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is now a focus of research and development programmes designed to support decision making about future technology deployment. In this perspective piece, we outline some of the approaches to responsible research and innovation (RRI) being put to work in a United Kingdom-based programme organising field trials of various carbon removal methods. Unlike the disruptive technologies that predominate in RRI scholarship, many land-based methods for carbon removal have already been deployed, in some cases over many decades, with governance closely linked with longstanding fields of research and practice. We highlight why responsible innovation frameworks that developed in the context of geoengineering controversies may be only partially-suited to field trials of land-based carbon removal methods. We suggest that field trials of carbon removal methods are not simply evidentiary procedures but also strategic sites within an emerging innovation regime where RRI approaches can be both implemented and critically tested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Climate
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2025.1658453
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Geoengineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsible research and innovation of carbon removal: strategies for field trials

Laurie Waller, Julie Ingram, Karen Henwood, Emily Cox et al.
Frontiers in Climate
Climate Change and Geoengineering
article

Responsible research and innovation of carbon removal: strategies for field trials

Laurie Waller, Julie Ingram, Karen Henwood, Emily Cox, A. Binner, Nick Pidgeon, Rob Bellamy, Rosie Everett, Kate O’Sullivan, Alessandro Silvestri, Catherine Waddams Price, Carol Morris, Mark Reed, T. García
article en

Abstract

Demonstrating methods for removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere is now a focus of research and development programmes designed to support decision making about future technology deployment. In this perspective piece, we outline some of the approaches to responsible research and innovation (RRI) being put to work in a United Kingdom-based programme organising field trials of various carbon removal methods. Unlike the disruptive technologies that predominate in RRI scholarship, many land-based methods for carbon removal have already been deployed, in some cases over many decades, with governance closely linked with longstanding fields of research and practice. We highlight why responsible innovation frameworks that developed in the context of geoengineering controversies may be only partially-suited to field trials of land-based carbon removal methods. We suggest that field trials of carbon removal methods are not simply evidentiary procedures but also strategic sites within an emerging innovation regime where RRI approaches can be both implemented and critically tested.

Frontiers in ClimateVol. 7
University of Gloucestershire (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), University of Exeter (GB), Scotland's Rural College (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Directorate for Biological Sciences, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Climate Change and Geoengineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.