Kenya’s blue rebalancing after the Somalia v. Kenya maritime delimitation judgment: a strategic toolkit for restoring leverage

The October 2021 ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the Kenya-Somalia maritime boundary dispute significantly undermined Kenya’s strategic and economic interests. This policy brief proposes a non-militarized toolkit to help Kenya regain leverage. The toolkit combines legal innovation through the exploitation of ambiguities in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), economic statecraft via the issuance of blue sovereign bonds, and narrative reframing that consistently highlights Somalia’s governance failures. By leveraging regional alliances and multilateral partnerships, Kenya can mitigate the adverse impacts of the ruling, safeguard its maritime interests, and assert its leadership in regional maritime governance without escalating tensions. This approach offers a replicable model for smaller states navigating territorial disputes in the wake of unfavorable legal rulings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Political Science
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1679767
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kenya’s blue rebalancing after the Somalia v. Kenya maritime delimitation judgment: a strategic toolkit for restoring leverage

Jie Sun
Frontiers in Political Science
International Maritime Law Issues
article

Kenya’s blue rebalancing after the Somalia v. Kenya maritime delimitation judgment: a strategic toolkit for restoring leverage

Jie Sun
article en

Abstract

The October 2021 ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the Kenya-Somalia maritime boundary dispute significantly undermined Kenya’s strategic and economic interests. This policy brief proposes a non-militarized toolkit to help Kenya regain leverage. The toolkit combines legal innovation through the exploitation of ambiguities in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), economic statecraft via the issuance of blue sovereign bonds, and narrative reframing that consistently highlights Somalia’s governance failures. By leveraging regional alliances and multilateral partnerships, Kenya can mitigate the adverse impacts of the ruling, safeguard its maritime interests, and assert its leadership in regional maritime governance without escalating tensions. This approach offers a replicable model for smaller states navigating territorial disputes in the wake of unfavorable legal rulings.

Frontiers in Political ScienceVol. 7
Hunan University (CN), Changsha University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
International Maritime Law Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.