Modelling societal preferences for automated vehicle behaviour with ethical goal functions

This study contributes the first empirical operationalization of ethical frameworks for AVs through the development of an Ethical Goal Function and demonstrates how it can be embedded in a Socio-Technological Feedback (SOTEF) Loop for continuous societal alignment. The dual contribution advances both the theoretical grounding and practical implementation of human-centered ethics in automated decision-making. However, several limitations remain. The reliance on a Dutch university sample restricts cultural generalizability, and textual presentation may limit ecological validity. Future work should expand the cultural diversity of participants and compare alternative presentation modalities (e.g., visual, immersive) to better capture real-world decision contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1676225
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling societal preferences for automated vehicle behaviour with ethical goal functions

Marieke Martens, Peter Werkhoven, Leon Kester, Chloe Gros
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Modelling societal preferences for automated vehicle behaviour with ethical goal functions

Marieke Martens, Peter Werkhoven, Leon Kester, Chloe Gros
article en

Abstract

This study contributes the first empirical operationalization of ethical frameworks for AVs through the development of an Ethical Goal Function and demonstrates how it can be embedded in a Socio-Technological Feedback (SOTEF) Loop for continuous societal alignment. The dual contribution advances both the theoretical grounding and practical implementation of human-centered ethics in automated decision-making. However, several limitations remain. The reliance on a Dutch university sample restricts cultural generalizability, and textual presentation may limit ecological validity. Future work should expand the cultural diversity of participants and compare alternative presentation modalities (e.g., visual, immersive) to better capture real-world decision contexts.

Frontiers in Artificial IntelligenceVol. 8
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modelling societal preferences for automated vehicle behaviour with ethical goal functions — Marieke Martens, Peter Werkhoven, et al. · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS