Evaluation of MobileNetV3-Large for crack classification across low- and high-resolution images

Introduction This paper evaluates the robustness and generalization ability of five recently developed Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG16), Google Inception Net (GoogLeNet), Mobile Network version 3 Large (MobileNetV3-Large), Efficient Network B0 (EfficientNetB0) and Efficient Network version 2 Small (EfficientNetV2-S), on crack recognition and classification. Methods This study proposes a semantic segmentation based on VGG16- U-Net to address the issue of background noise in the images automatically and the transfer learning with fine-tuning is used to improve the performance of the CNNs in the bridge crack image dataset and building crack image dataset (transverse cracks, vertical cracks, oblique cracks and irregular cracks). Results The results indicate that the MobileNetV3-Large has the best performance. For the low-resolution building crack image dataset, the accuracy of the crack recognition reaches 99.58% and the F1-score reaches 99.60%. The accuracy of the classification reaches 94.70% and the Macro-F1 reaches 94.71%. For the higher resolution bridge crack image dataset, the accuracy of the classification reaches 95.70% and the Macro-F1 reaches 95.67%. Discussion The results show that the MobileNetV3-Large has the best robustness and generalization ability with a small CNN size and the shortest training time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Built Environment
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2025.1724879
Primary Topic
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of MobileNetV3-Large for crack classification across low- and high-resolution images

Haodong Yao, Jiyang Fu, Zhen‐Li Huang, Liujie Chen et al.
Frontiers in Built Environment
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
article

Evaluation of MobileNetV3-Large for crack classification across low- and high-resolution images

Haodong Yao, Jiyang Fu, Zhen‐Li Huang, Liujie Chen, Ke Gan, Ching‐Tai Ng, Jing Zhang
article en

Abstract

Introduction This paper evaluates the robustness and generalization ability of five recently developed Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Visual Geometry Group 16 (VGG16), Google Inception Net (GoogLeNet), Mobile Network version 3 Large (MobileNetV3-Large), Efficient Network B0 (EfficientNetB0) and Efficient Network version 2 Small (EfficientNetV2-S), on crack recognition and classification. Methods This study proposes a semantic segmentation based on VGG16- U-Net to address the issue of background noise in the images automatically and the transfer learning with fine-tuning is used to improve the performance of the CNNs in the bridge crack image dataset and building crack image dataset (transverse cracks, vertical cracks, oblique cracks and irregular cracks). Results The results indicate that the MobileNetV3-Large has the best performance. For the low-resolution building crack image dataset, the accuracy of the crack recognition reaches 99.58% and the F1-score reaches 99.60%. The accuracy of the classification reaches 94.70% and the Macro-F1 reaches 94.71%. For the higher resolution bridge crack image dataset, the accuracy of the classification reaches 95.70% and the Macro-F1 reaches 95.67%. Discussion The results show that the MobileNetV3-Large has the best robustness and generalization ability with a small CNN size and the shortest training time.

Frontiers in Built EnvironmentVol. 11
Guangzhou University (CN), China Guangzhou Analysis and Testing Center (CN), The University of Adelaide (AU)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.