Reconsidering the Widespread Use of Active Vitamin D Analogues for Osteoporosis in Japan: A Call for Evidence-Based Prescription Practices

In Japan, active vitamin D has been widely prescribed for osteoporosis due to its regulatory approval, in contrast to international practice where it is not considered standard therapy. However, growing evidence indicates that these agents offer limited efficacy in fracture prevention and may pose significant risks. Mechanistically, active vitamin D increases both serum calcium and phosphate, which, in the absence of bone-forming signals such as growth, fracture healing, or high mechanical loading, may promote ectopic calcification rather than bone strengthening. Osteoporosis, particularly in low-turnover states common in aging or immobilization, is poorly responsive to active vitamin D, as calcium incorporation into bone is physiologically limited. Clinical trials have shown little benefit of vitamin D supplementation in individuals without deficiency, and adverse outcomes such as hypercalcemia, nephrolithiasis, kidney impairment, and vascular calcification have been documented, including a recent case series in patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities. Despite these concerns, Japanese guidelines continue to list active vitamin D as an effective option, diverging from the recommendations of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and the United States Endocrine Society, which reflect nuanced, evidence-graded recommendations rather than explicit discouragement in primary osteoporosis. The persistence of widespread prescribing in Japan likely reflects historical practices, regulatory frameworks, and economic incentives. Given the aging population and high prevalence of osteoporosis, reconsideration of this approach is warranted. Prescribing should be restricted to clear endocrine indications such as hypoparathyroidism or chronic kidney disease-related secondary hyperparathyroidism. Aligning national practice with international standards, while promoting nutritional vitamin D and other evidence-based therapies, could reduce unnecessary harm and improve healthcare efficiency.

Publication Details

Journal
JMA Journal
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2025-0401
Primary Topic
Vitamin D Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering the Widespread Use of Active Vitamin D Analogues for Osteoporosis in Japan: A Call for Evidence-Based Prescription Practices

JMA Journal
Vitamin D Research Studies
article

Reconsidering the Widespread Use of Active Vitamin D Analogues for Osteoporosis in Japan: A Call for Evidence-Based Prescription Practices

article en

Abstract

In Japan, active vitamin D has been widely prescribed for osteoporosis due to its regulatory approval, in contrast to international practice where it is not considered standard therapy. However, growing evidence indicates that these agents offer limited efficacy in fracture prevention and may pose significant risks. Mechanistically, active vitamin D increases both serum calcium and phosphate, which, in the absence of bone-forming signals such as growth, fracture healing, or high mechanical loading, may promote ectopic calcification rather than bone strengthening. Osteoporosis, particularly in low-turnover states common in aging or immobilization, is poorly responsive to active vitamin D, as calcium incorporation into bone is physiologically limited. Clinical trials have shown little benefit of vitamin D supplementation in individuals without deficiency, and adverse outcomes such as hypercalcemia, nephrolithiasis, kidney impairment, and vascular calcification have been documented, including a recent case series in patients with severe motor and intellectual disabilities. Despite these concerns, Japanese guidelines continue to list active vitamin D as an effective option, diverging from the recommendations of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and the United States Endocrine Society, which reflect nuanced, evidence-graded recommendations rather than explicit discouragement in primary osteoporosis. The persistence of widespread prescribing in Japan likely reflects historical practices, regulatory frameworks, and economic incentives. Given the aging population and high prevalence of osteoporosis, reconsideration of this approach is warranted. Prescribing should be restricted to clear endocrine indications such as hypoparathyroidism or chronic kidney disease-related secondary hyperparathyroidism. Aligning national practice with international standards, while promoting nutritional vitamin D and other evidence-based therapies, could reduce unnecessary harm and improve healthcare efficiency.

JMA JournalVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Vitamin D Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.