Blood Pressure, Urinalysis, and Edema Assessment in Perinatal Care: From Historical Foundations to Evidence-Based Practice

The triad of blood pressure measurement, urinalysis, and edema assessment has constituted the cornerstone of prenatal care for over eight decades and has been consistently recorded at each examination in Japan's Maternal and Child Health Handbook. Historically, these examinations were prioritized to facilitate the early diagnosis and treatment of pregnancy toxemia-now termed hypertensive disorders of pregnancy-which once represented a leading cause of maternal mortality. The triad has undeniably played a pivotal role in the early diagnosis, prediction, and treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, while potentially contributing to the detection of other obstetric complications. However, conclusive evidence linking these conventionally performed assessments to actual pregnancy and delivery outcomes remains limited, and critical unresolved issues persist within each examination category. Blood pressure assessment requires the establishment of optimal blood pressure thresholds to achieve favorable pregnancy and perinatal outcomes; to achieve this, home blood pressure monitoring should be adopted. Evidence-based target blood pressure ranges for treatment initiation in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and therapeutic targets are urgently needed. For urinary protein assessment, the establishment of standardized criteria for postpartum proteinuria follow-up is essential. In terms of edema, critical evidence is lacking regarding the evaluation and treatment of pathological edema that adversely affects pregnancy outcomes. This review traces the historical evolution of these examinations while critically examining their contemporary role in perinatal care. A notable characteristic of this triad is its noninvasive nature and minimal cost burden. The establishment of robust evidence supporting their clinical utility could optimize maternal and fetal outcomes while maintaining cost-effective healthcare delivery.

Publication Details

Journal
JMA Journal
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2025-0241
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blood Pressure, Urinalysis, and Edema Assessment in Perinatal Care: From Historical Foundations to Evidence-Based Practice

JMA Journal
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Blood Pressure, Urinalysis, and Edema Assessment in Perinatal Care: From Historical Foundations to Evidence-Based Practice

article en

Abstract

The triad of blood pressure measurement, urinalysis, and edema assessment has constituted the cornerstone of prenatal care for over eight decades and has been consistently recorded at each examination in Japan's Maternal and Child Health Handbook. Historically, these examinations were prioritized to facilitate the early diagnosis and treatment of pregnancy toxemia-now termed hypertensive disorders of pregnancy-which once represented a leading cause of maternal mortality. The triad has undeniably played a pivotal role in the early diagnosis, prediction, and treatment of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, while potentially contributing to the detection of other obstetric complications. However, conclusive evidence linking these conventionally performed assessments to actual pregnancy and delivery outcomes remains limited, and critical unresolved issues persist within each examination category. Blood pressure assessment requires the establishment of optimal blood pressure thresholds to achieve favorable pregnancy and perinatal outcomes; to achieve this, home blood pressure monitoring should be adopted. Evidence-based target blood pressure ranges for treatment initiation in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and therapeutic targets are urgently needed. For urinary protein assessment, the establishment of standardized criteria for postpartum proteinuria follow-up is essential. In terms of edema, critical evidence is lacking regarding the evaluation and treatment of pathological edema that adversely affects pregnancy outcomes. This review traces the historical evolution of these examinations while critically examining their contemporary role in perinatal care. A notable characteristic of this triad is its noninvasive nature and minimal cost burden. The establishment of robust evidence supporting their clinical utility could optimize maternal and fetal outcomes while maintaining cost-effective healthcare delivery.

JMA JournalVol. 9(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.