Upcycling rice husk biowaste to improve cement-based peat soil stabilization

• A three-stage experimental strategy confirmed that RHA and RHF improved cement-based peat soil stabilization. • RHA played a major role as a pozzolanic material, while RHF is secondary as reinforcement. • UCS increased by 146.6 % with RHA alone and by 202.1 % with both RHA and RHF compared to cement only. • Cementitious products (C-S-H) resulted from RHA and Ca(OH) 2 -treated RHF filled pores and bonded soil particles. • Upcycling biowaste significantly reduces CO 2 emissions and cost by 61.9 % and 25.8 % compared with using cement only. Traditional stabilizers, such as kaolin and sodium bentonite, introduce complications when applied to cement-based peat soil stabilization. This study explores biowaste stabilizers – rice husk ash (RHA) as a pozzolan material and rice husk fiber (RHF) as reinforcing – as a sustainable and practical alternative. A three-stage experimental strategy was designed to identify the optimal stabilization method. Stage 1 determined the ideal RHA particle size and content without RHF. Stage 2 incorporated RHF to assess its best pretreatment method and optimal dosage; Stage 3 investigated the stabilization mechanisms. A series of physical and mechanical experiments confirmed that RHA and RHF improved cement-based peat soil stabilization. RHA played a primary role as a pozzolanic material, while RHF is secondary as reinforcement. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) increased by 146.6 % with RHA alone and by 202.1 % with both RHA and RHF compared to cement only. This is achieved by using fine RHA particles and Ca(OH) 2 -treated RHF. The content for both RHA and RHF is critical, especially noting that the optimal content of RHA varies as the cement content varies. Microscopic analysis confirmed that RHA enhanced pozzolanic reaction, producing more cementitious products (C-S-H) that filled pores and bonded soil particles. Additionally, a significant quantity of cementitious products formed on the coarse surface of pre-treated RHF, reinforcing soil-fiber bonding. Stabilizing 1 m 3 of peat soil by upcycling biowaste reduces carbon emissions by 61.9 % and costs by 25.8 % compared to using cement only. This study demonstrates that upcycling biowaste provides an effective, sustainable, economical, and easy-to-implement solution for improving cement-based peat soil stabilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
Published
2025-09-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2025.101685
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upcycling rice husk biowaste to improve cement-based peat soil stabilization

Jiangdong Cai, Miao Li, Zhiliang Wang, Linfang Shen
2 citations
SOILS AND FOUNDATIONS
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
1.91
article

Upcycling rice husk biowaste to improve cement-based peat soil stabilization

Jiangdong Cai, Miao Li, Zhiliang Wang, Linfang Shen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• A three-stage experimental strategy confirmed that RHA and RHF improved cement-based peat soil stabilization. • RHA played a major role as a pozzolanic material, while RHF is secondary as reinforcement. • UCS increased by 146.6 % with RHA alone and by 202.1 % with both RHA and RHF compared to cement only. • Cementitious products (C-S-H) resulted from RHA and Ca(OH) 2 -treated RHF filled pores and bonded soil particles. • Upcycling biowaste significantly reduces CO 2 emissions and cost by 61.9 % and 25.8 % compared with using cement only. Traditional stabilizers, such as kaolin and sodium bentonite, introduce complications when applied to cement-based peat soil stabilization. This study explores biowaste stabilizers – rice husk ash (RHA) as a pozzolan material and rice husk fiber (RHF) as reinforcing – as a sustainable and practical alternative. A three-stage experimental strategy was designed to identify the optimal stabilization method. Stage 1 determined the ideal RHA particle size and content without RHF. Stage 2 incorporated RHF to assess its best pretreatment method and optimal dosage; Stage 3 investigated the stabilization mechanisms. A series of physical and mechanical experiments confirmed that RHA and RHF improved cement-based peat soil stabilization. RHA played a primary role as a pozzolanic material, while RHF is secondary as reinforcement. Unconfined compressive strength (UCS) increased by 146.6 % with RHA alone and by 202.1 % with both RHA and RHF compared to cement only. This is achieved by using fine RHA particles and Ca(OH) 2 -treated RHF. The content for both RHA and RHF is critical, especially noting that the optimal content of RHA varies as the cement content varies. Microscopic analysis confirmed that RHA enhanced pozzolanic reaction, producing more cementitious products (C-S-H) that filled pores and bonded soil particles. Additionally, a significant quantity of cementitious products formed on the coarse surface of pre-treated RHF, reinforcing soil-fiber bonding. Stabilizing 1 m 3 of peat soil by upcycling biowaste reduces carbon emissions by 61.9 % and costs by 25.8 % compared to using cement only. This study demonstrates that upcycling biowaste provides an effective, sustainable, economical, and easy-to-implement solution for improving cement-based peat soil stabilization.

SOILS AND FOUNDATIONSVol. 65(6)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), Charles Sturt University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.