A rating-only approach to perceptual discrimination

Abstract Confidence ratings have been used in the absence of a binary decision to attenuate bias effects on decision criteria, thus, mitigating a common source of error. We tested whether a rating-only approach could be used to effectively discriminate whether a dynamic grid consisted of predominantly blue or predominantly orange pixels, and target present from target absent trials in a visual search task. Experiment 1 (n = 42) confirmed that participants could use the rating-only approach to discriminate between stimulus types. Experiment 2 (n = 99) tested whether the rating-only approach could discriminate luggage images that did or did not contain a weapon, and whether using ratings could mitigate the low prevalence effect (where rarely occurring targets often go undetected). The rating-only approach discriminated target present from target absent trials, however the absence of clear low prevalence effects precluded an investigation of the use of a ratings-based approach for countering this cause of error.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241032
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A rating-only approach to perceptual discrimination

Amelia Kohl, Talira Kucina, Matthew A. Palmer, James D. Sauer
Royal Society Open Science
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

A rating-only approach to perceptual discrimination

Amelia Kohl, Talira Kucina, Matthew A. Palmer, James D. Sauer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Confidence ratings have been used in the absence of a binary decision to attenuate bias effects on decision criteria, thus, mitigating a common source of error. We tested whether a rating-only approach could be used to effectively discriminate whether a dynamic grid consisted of predominantly blue or predominantly orange pixels, and target present from target absent trials in a visual search task. Experiment 1 (n = 42) confirmed that participants could use the rating-only approach to discriminate between stimulus types. Experiment 2 (n = 99) tested whether the rating-only approach could discriminate luggage images that did or did not contain a weapon, and whether using ratings could mitigate the low prevalence effect (where rarely occurring targets often go undetected). The rating-only approach discriminated target present from target absent trials, however the absence of clear low prevalence effects precluded an investigation of the use of a ratings-based approach for countering this cause of error.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 12(12)
Birmingham City University (GB), University of Tasmania (AU), University College Birmingham (GB), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A rating-only approach to perceptual discrimination — Amelia Kohl, Talira Kucina, et al. · Royal Society Open Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS