Data from sentinel public gardens are useful indicators of potential plant invasion

Abstract Invasive plants negatively impact natural areas and impose huge costs associated with control and management. A new approach to significantly reduce these effects is to identify species in the earliest stages of spread, using data collected by public gardens across North America. Known as Public Gardens as Sentinels against Invasive Plants (PGSIP), this network includes multiple gardens, each contributing reports of these problematic species to a shared database using standardized guidelines. We examined this dataset to identify newly spreading species being noticed within gardens within different regions and determined whether they have been reported as state-listed/regulated/noxious outside gardens. As of November 2024, 53 PGSIP gardens in 28 U.S. states and Canadian provinces had submitted 996 reports, consisting of 597 unique species. The most commonly listed species were Amur corktree ( Phellodendron amurense Rupr.), burning bush [ Euonymus alatus (Thunb.) Siebold], and wintercreeper [ Euonymus fortunei (Turcz.) Hand.-Maz.]. Other less frequently listed species included golden rain tree ( Koelreuteria paniculata Laxm.), Norway maple ( Acer platanoides L.), and castor aralia [ Kalopanax septemlobus (Thunb.) Koidz.]. Of the 597 species, 36% were not listed by any state or province; gardens also had several species on watchlists, including Japanese tree lilac [ Syringa reticulata (Blume) H. Hara] and Siberian squill ( Scilla siberica Andrews). Our results demonstrate the utility of the approach and value of the database. This information can now inform the efforts of land managers, invasion biologists, the horticultural industry, and agencies tasked with invasive plant monitoring and assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Invasive Plant Science and Management
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2025.10035
Primary Topic
Biological Control of Invasive Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data from sentinel public gardens are useful indicators of potential plant invasion

Brittany Shultz, Nadia Cavallin, Jonathan Breiner, Kayri Havens et al.
Invasive Plant Science and Management
Biological Control of Invasive Species
article

Data from sentinel public gardens are useful indicators of potential plant invasion

Brittany Shultz, Nadia Cavallin, Jonathan Breiner, Kayri Havens, Hans Landel, Theresa M. Culley, Kurt Dreisilker, Michelle Beloskur
article en

Abstract

Abstract Invasive plants negatively impact natural areas and impose huge costs associated with control and management. A new approach to significantly reduce these effects is to identify species in the earliest stages of spread, using data collected by public gardens across North America. Known as Public Gardens as Sentinels against Invasive Plants (PGSIP), this network includes multiple gardens, each contributing reports of these problematic species to a shared database using standardized guidelines. We examined this dataset to identify newly spreading species being noticed within gardens within different regions and determined whether they have been reported as state-listed/regulated/noxious outside gardens. As of November 2024, 53 PGSIP gardens in 28 U.S. states and Canadian provinces had submitted 996 reports, consisting of 597 unique species. The most commonly listed species were Amur corktree ( Phellodendron amurense Rupr.), burning bush [ Euonymus alatus (Thunb.) Siebold], and wintercreeper [ Euonymus fortunei (Turcz.) Hand.-Maz.]. Other less frequently listed species included golden rain tree ( Koelreuteria paniculata Laxm.), Norway maple ( Acer platanoides L.), and castor aralia [ Kalopanax septemlobus (Thunb.) Koidz.]. Of the 597 species, 36% were not listed by any state or province; gardens also had several species on watchlists, including Japanese tree lilac [ Syringa reticulata (Blume) H. Hara] and Siberian squill ( Scilla siberica Andrews). Our results demonstrate the utility of the approach and value of the database. This information can now inform the efforts of land managers, invasion biologists, the horticultural industry, and agencies tasked with invasive plant monitoring and assessment.

Invasive Plant Science and ManagementVol. 19
United States Army Corps of Engineers (US), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB), Center for Plant Conservation (US), Morton Arboretum (US), Brooklyn Botanic Garden (US), Missouri Botanical Garden (US), Denver Botanic Gardens (US), Royal Botanic Garden Sydney (AU), Real Jardín Botánico (ES), Invasive Plant Research Laboratory (US), Chicago Botanic Garden, University of Cincinnati (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Biological Control of Invasive Species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.