Measuring Precise <scp>TFP</scp> Growth Under Trade Liberalisation: Stripping Away Omitted Price Bias and Demand Shocks

ABSTRACT We address two important sources of bias that remain unaccounted for in most analyses of firm‐level productivity and trade policy; that is, omitted output price bias and demand shocks. Using firm‐level data that includes product‐level price and physical output measures, we mitigate the omitted output price bias typically encountered when using sectoral deflators. Besides being a primary determinant of firm survival, our precise controls for demand shocks also help account for quality differences between firms. We then test the methodology developed by De Loecker for use with firm revenue data and find that its accuracy depends on the precision of the price deflator. Results from Pakistan suggest that, after controlling for omitted price bias and quality differences through demand shocks, the impact of a 10% reduction in tariffs on firm‐level productivity decreases from 1.26% to 0.36%. The net impact of trade liberalisation has been a mere 2.2%, with the biggest gains in the least protected segments. The estimates for precise demand shocks are reasonably close to the 3% improvement estimated using disaggregated price and output data with De Loecker et al. JEL Classification: F1, D22, D24, L23.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Economy
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.70036
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Precise TFP Growth Under Trade Liberalisation: Stripping Away Omitted Price Bias and Demand Shocks

Azam Chaudhry, Nida Jamil, Theresa Thompson Chaudhry
World Economy
Global trade and economics
article

Measuring Precise TFP Growth Under Trade Liberalisation: Stripping Away Omitted Price Bias and Demand Shocks

Azam Chaudhry, Nida Jamil, Theresa Thompson Chaudhry
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We address two important sources of bias that remain unaccounted for in most analyses of firm‐level productivity and trade policy; that is, omitted output price bias and demand shocks. Using firm‐level data that includes product‐level price and physical output measures, we mitigate the omitted output price bias typically encountered when using sectoral deflators. Besides being a primary determinant of firm survival, our precise controls for demand shocks also help account for quality differences between firms. We then test the methodology developed by De Loecker for use with firm revenue data and find that its accuracy depends on the precision of the price deflator. Results from Pakistan suggest that, after controlling for omitted price bias and quality differences through demand shocks, the impact of a 10% reduction in tariffs on firm‐level productivity decreases from 1.26% to 0.36%. The net impact of trade liberalisation has been a mere 2.2%, with the biggest gains in the least protected segments. The estimates for precise demand shocks are reasonably close to the 3% improvement estimated using disaggregated price and output data with De Loecker et al. JEL Classification: F1, D22, D24, L23.

World EconomyVol. 49(2)
University of Limerick (IE), Lahore School of Economics (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.