Leveraging long‐term datasets to quantify variability in reference wetland hydrology

Abstract Introduction Wetlands are characterized by hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophytic vegetation, from which numerous wetland classification schemes have been derived that propose groups of “similar” wetlands. However, trends and variation in long‐term hydrology between and among these classifications remain poorly understood. Objectives Our study aimed to answer three questions: (1) How variable is wetland hydrology between and among different reference wetland types? (2) How are attributes of the ecohydrologic regime related to wetland type? and (3) Which attributes of wetland morphometry (if any) are predictive of wetland ecohydrology across wetland types? Methods We utilized 17 years of bi‐weekly hydrology data from 30 reference wetlands. Hydrologic similarity was assessed using non‐parametric Spearman correlations. Differences in ecohydrologic regimes among wetland types were tested using Kruskal–Wallis and pairwise Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests, principal components analysis, and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). To evaluate morphometric controls, we related morphometric attributes (e.g., depth, perimeter:area ratio) to ecohydrologic metrics using redundancy analysis with variance partitioning and stepwise model selection. Results Hydrologic similarity varied widely among wetland types ( r = 0.38 to 0.95). Ecohydrologic regimes showed limited internal consistency, with up to 92% of metrics differing among cypress wetlands and up to 100% of pairwise comparisons differing across all wetland types for magnitude‐based metrics. Wetland depth and perimeter: area ratio emerged as the strongest morphometric predictors of ecohydrologic regime, together explaining 20% of observed variance. Conclusions Wetlands of the same classification often exhibit divergent hydrologic regimes, but simple morphometric attributes improve predictions of ecohydrologic similarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70279
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging long‐term datasets to quantify variability in reference wetland hydrology

David Kaplan, RK PRICE
Restoration Ecology
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Leveraging long‐term datasets to quantify variability in reference wetland hydrology

David Kaplan, RK PRICE
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Wetlands are characterized by hydrology, hydric soils, and hydrophytic vegetation, from which numerous wetland classification schemes have been derived that propose groups of “similar” wetlands. However, trends and variation in long‐term hydrology between and among these classifications remain poorly understood. Objectives Our study aimed to answer three questions: (1) How variable is wetland hydrology between and among different reference wetland types? (2) How are attributes of the ecohydrologic regime related to wetland type? and (3) Which attributes of wetland morphometry (if any) are predictive of wetland ecohydrology across wetland types? Methods We utilized 17 years of bi‐weekly hydrology data from 30 reference wetlands. Hydrologic similarity was assessed using non‐parametric Spearman correlations. Differences in ecohydrologic regimes among wetland types were tested using Kruskal–Wallis and pairwise Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests, principal components analysis, and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). To evaluate morphometric controls, we related morphometric attributes (e.g., depth, perimeter:area ratio) to ecohydrologic metrics using redundancy analysis with variance partitioning and stepwise model selection. Results Hydrologic similarity varied widely among wetland types ( r = 0.38 to 0.95). Ecohydrologic regimes showed limited internal consistency, with up to 92% of metrics differing among cypress wetlands and up to 100% of pairwise comparisons differing across all wetland types for magnitude‐based metrics. Wetland depth and perimeter: area ratio emerged as the strongest morphometric predictors of ecohydrologic regime, together explaining 20% of observed variance. Conclusions Wetlands of the same classification often exhibit divergent hydrologic regimes, but simple morphometric attributes improve predictions of ecohydrologic similarity.

Restoration EcologyVol. 34(3)
AdventHealth East Orlando (US), University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leveraging long‐term datasets to quantify variability in reference wetland hydrology — David Kaplan, RK PRICE · Restoration Ecology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS