Who Benefits From Green Tech? How Eco‐Innovation and Process Eco‐Innovation Shape Emissions Inequality Across <scp>G7</scp> Economies

ABSTRACT This study examines the asymmetric effects of eco‐innovation on income‐based carbon emissions inequality within G7 economies over the period 1990–2023. Theoretically grounded in innovation diffusion theory and political economy frameworks, we argue that green technological advancements exert non‐linear, directional effects on emissions inequality due to differential adoption patterns across income groups, elite capture mechanisms, and path‐dependent lock‐in effects. Unlike prior research that conflates eco‐innovation types or focuses solely on aggregate emissions, we distinguish between comprehensive eco‐innovation ( ECON ) and process‐oriented eco‐innovation ( ECOP ), examining their separate positive and negative shocks on emissions inequality—measured as per capita CO 2 emissions of the wealthiest 10% of the population. Employing the method of moments quantile regression (MMQR) with asymmetric specifications, we provide novel evidence that increases and decreases in eco‐innovation produce differential distributional impacts across the emissions inequality spectrum. Our findings reveal that while eco‐innovation expansion reduces emissions inequality in low‐inequality contexts, its benefits are asymmetrically concentrated among affluent groups in high‐inequality settings, with process eco‐innovation showing heterogeneous effects across quantiles and innovation directions. These results underscore the critical need for differentiated policy interventions that ensure green technological transitions promote both environmental sustainability and social equity, preventing the entrenchment of carbon privilege among wealthy populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70525
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Benefits From Green Tech? How Eco‐Innovation and Process Eco‐Innovation Shape Emissions Inequality Across G7 Economies

Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany, Hayet Soltani, Emmanuel Yamoah Cobbold, Buhari Doğan et al.
Sustainable Development
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Who Benefits From Green Tech? How Eco‐Innovation and Process Eco‐Innovation Shape Emissions Inequality Across G7 Economies

Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany, Hayet Soltani, Emmanuel Yamoah Cobbold, Buhari Doğan, Brahim Bergougui, Ehab Ebrahim Mohamed Ebrahim
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the asymmetric effects of eco‐innovation on income‐based carbon emissions inequality within G7 economies over the period 1990–2023. Theoretically grounded in innovation diffusion theory and political economy frameworks, we argue that green technological advancements exert non‐linear, directional effects on emissions inequality due to differential adoption patterns across income groups, elite capture mechanisms, and path‐dependent lock‐in effects. Unlike prior research that conflates eco‐innovation types or focuses solely on aggregate emissions, we distinguish between comprehensive eco‐innovation ( ECON ) and process‐oriented eco‐innovation ( ECOP ), examining their separate positive and negative shocks on emissions inequality—measured as per capita CO 2 emissions of the wealthiest 10% of the population. Employing the method of moments quantile regression (MMQR) with asymmetric specifications, we provide novel evidence that increases and decreases in eco‐innovation produce differential distributional impacts across the emissions inequality spectrum. Our findings reveal that while eco‐innovation expansion reduces emissions inequality in low‐inequality contexts, its benefits are asymmetrically concentrated among affluent groups in high‐inequality settings, with process eco‐innovation showing heterogeneous effects across quantiles and innovation directions. These results underscore the critical need for differentiated policy interventions that ensure green technological transitions promote both environmental sustainability and social equity, preventing the entrenchment of carbon privilege among wealthy populations.

Sustainable Development
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Birmingham City University (GB), Kafrelsheikh University (EG), University of Ulster (GB), University of Sfax (TN), Applied Science Private University (JO), Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi (TR), Taif University (SA), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Western Caspian University (AZ), National Higher School of Statistics and Applied Economy (DZ), Qatar University (QA), University of Birmingham (GB), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.