Unwinding Stochastic Order Flow: When to Warehouse Trades

ABSTRACT We study how to unwind stochastic order flow with minimal transaction costs. Stochastic order flow arises, e.g., in the central risk book (CRB), a centralized trading desk that aggregates order flows within a financial institution. The desk can warehouse in‐flow orders, ideally netting them against subsequent opposite orders (internalization), or route them to the market (externalization) and incur costs related to price impact and bid‐ask spread. We model and solve this problem for a general class of in‐flow processes, enabling us to study in detail how in‐flow characteristics affect optimal strategy and core trading metrics. Our model allows for an analytic solution in semi‐closed form and is readily implementable numerically. Compared with a standard execution problem where the order size is known upfront, the unwind strategy exhibits an additive adjustment for projected future in‐flows. Its sign depends on the autocorrelation of orders; only truth‐telling (martingale) flow is unwound myopically. In addition to analytic results, we present extensive simulations for different use cases and regimes, and introduce new metrics of practical interest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematical Finance
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mafi.70019
Primary Topic
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unwinding Stochastic Order Flow: When to Warehouse Trades

Marcel Nutz, Kevin R. Webster, Long Zhao
Mathematical Finance
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
article

Unwinding Stochastic Order Flow: When to Warehouse Trades

Marcel Nutz, Kevin R. Webster, Long Zhao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We study how to unwind stochastic order flow with minimal transaction costs. Stochastic order flow arises, e.g., in the central risk book (CRB), a centralized trading desk that aggregates order flows within a financial institution. The desk can warehouse in‐flow orders, ideally netting them against subsequent opposite orders (internalization), or route them to the market (externalization) and incur costs related to price impact and bid‐ask spread. We model and solve this problem for a general class of in‐flow processes, enabling us to study in detail how in‐flow characteristics affect optimal strategy and core trading metrics. Our model allows for an analytic solution in semi‐closed form and is readily implementable numerically. Compared with a standard execution problem where the order size is known upfront, the unwind strategy exhibits an additive adjustment for projected future in‐flows. Its sign depends on the autocorrelation of orders; only truth‐telling (martingale) flow is unwound myopically. In addition to analytic results, we present extensive simulations for different use cases and regimes, and introduce new metrics of practical interest.

Mathematical Finance
Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Supply Chain and Inventory Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.