Removing invasive stream macrofauna shifts nontarget invertebrate mesofauna through facilitation

Abstract Positive interactions among non‐native species can drive invasional meltdowns to the detriment of native biota. Here, we assessed whether targeted control of aquatic invasive species (AIS) can benefit native species by eliminating synergies among invaders. We did so by monitoring changes in the abundance of native and non‐native benthic invertebrates following the targeted removal of non‐native fish and crustaceans in 10 streams on the island of Oʻahu (Hawaiʻi, USA). Benthic invertebrate sampling was conducted in paired control reaches and removal reaches in each stream immediately following removals, one month following removals, and then at 2‐ to 3‐month intervals for 16 months. Temporal variations in the abundance, composition, and diversity of the native and non‐native invertebrates were compared among streams and between treatment reaches using multivariate data visualization and mixed‐effects models. We observed both seasonal shifts in overall community composition and treatment‐specific effects on the abundance of common taxa that were mediated by the number of AIS fish removed. Most notably, as removal of non‐native poeciliid fish increased, we observed concordant decreases (−32 ± 13% mean ± SE) in non‐native caddisfly ( Cheumatopsyche analis ) and increases (122 ± 69%) in partially native chironomid midges in the treatment reaches relative to the control reaches. Our results provide experimental evidence supporting the hypothesis that predation by introduced poeciliids on midges indirectly facilitates non‐native caddisfly populations via competitive release. Our findings indicate that removal of poeciliids allows midges to outcompete non‐native caddisflies and increase their abundance. Our study illustrates that targeted removal of non‐native species can have cascading negative effects on other introduced taxa. Understanding trophic relationships among invasive and native species can thus enhance management efforts by maximizing benefits to native species relative to effort and cost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosphere
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.70489
Primary Topic
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Removing invasive stream macrofauna shifts nontarget invertebrate mesofauna through facilitation

Peter B. McIntyre, Michael J. Blum, Christopher J. Patrick, Peter J. Lisi et al.
Ecosphere
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
article

Removing invasive stream macrofauna shifts nontarget invertebrate mesofauna through facilitation

Peter B. McIntyre, Michael J. Blum, Christopher J. Patrick, Peter J. Lisi, J. Derek Hogan, J. Kenneth Whitt
article en

Abstract

Abstract Positive interactions among non‐native species can drive invasional meltdowns to the detriment of native biota. Here, we assessed whether targeted control of aquatic invasive species (AIS) can benefit native species by eliminating synergies among invaders. We did so by monitoring changes in the abundance of native and non‐native benthic invertebrates following the targeted removal of non‐native fish and crustaceans in 10 streams on the island of Oʻahu (Hawaiʻi, USA). Benthic invertebrate sampling was conducted in paired control reaches and removal reaches in each stream immediately following removals, one month following removals, and then at 2‐ to 3‐month intervals for 16 months. Temporal variations in the abundance, composition, and diversity of the native and non‐native invertebrates were compared among streams and between treatment reaches using multivariate data visualization and mixed‐effects models. We observed both seasonal shifts in overall community composition and treatment‐specific effects on the abundance of common taxa that were mediated by the number of AIS fish removed. Most notably, as removal of non‐native poeciliid fish increased, we observed concordant decreases (−32 ± 13% mean ± SE) in non‐native caddisfly ( Cheumatopsyche analis ) and increases (122 ± 69%) in partially native chironomid midges in the treatment reaches relative to the control reaches. Our results provide experimental evidence supporting the hypothesis that predation by introduced poeciliids on midges indirectly facilitates non‐native caddisfly populations via competitive release. Our findings indicate that removal of poeciliids allows midges to outcompete non‐native caddisflies and increase their abundance. Our study illustrates that targeted removal of non‐native species can have cascading negative effects on other introduced taxa. Understanding trophic relationships among invasive and native species can thus enhance management efforts by maximizing benefits to native species relative to effort and cost.

EcosphereVol. 16(12)
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Cornell University (US), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (US), Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (US), Virginia Sea Grant (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.