Traditional Values in the International Realm: Why We Need More Dialogue between Anti-Gender Research and Foreign Policy Analysis

Abstract This research note argues for an increased dialogue between anti-gender politics research and feminist foreign policy analysis. Traditionally, comparative politics and sociology have examined anti-gender politics within the context of democratic backsliding and social movements, often incorporating transnational aspects, but rarely applying foreign policy analysis. The increasing prevalence of political leaders invoking illiberal gender norms in foreign and security policy, to position their political system in the global “culture wars,” warrants further cross-pollination between foreign policy analysis and over a decade of anti-gender research. To demonstrate this, this research note considers Russia’s use of “traditional values” in its foreign policy to justify authoritarianism and the use of force. The findings suggest that alongside the rise of feminist foreign policy, there is a parallel emergence of an anti-feminist foreign policy. More disciplinary dialogue is crucial for comprehensively grasping the global impact of anti-gender politics, especially regarding increased de-democratization and aggression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foreign Policy Analysis
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraf036
Primary Topic
Gender, Security, and Conflict
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditional Values in the International Realm: Why We Need More Dialogue between Anti-Gender Research and Foreign Policy Analysis

Leandra Bias
Foreign Policy Analysis
Gender, Security, and Conflict
article

Traditional Values in the International Realm: Why We Need More Dialogue between Anti-Gender Research and Foreign Policy Analysis

Leandra Bias
article en

Abstract

Abstract This research note argues for an increased dialogue between anti-gender politics research and feminist foreign policy analysis. Traditionally, comparative politics and sociology have examined anti-gender politics within the context of democratic backsliding and social movements, often incorporating transnational aspects, but rarely applying foreign policy analysis. The increasing prevalence of political leaders invoking illiberal gender norms in foreign and security policy, to position their political system in the global “culture wars,” warrants further cross-pollination between foreign policy analysis and over a decade of anti-gender research. To demonstrate this, this research note considers Russia’s use of “traditional values” in its foreign policy to justify authoritarianism and the use of force. The findings suggest that alongside the rise of feminist foreign policy, there is a parallel emergence of an anti-feminist foreign policy. More disciplinary dialogue is crucial for comprehensively grasping the global impact of anti-gender politics, especially regarding increased de-democratization and aggression.

Foreign Policy AnalysisVol. 22(1)
University of Fribourg (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Gender, Security, and Conflict
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.