Evaluating the follow-up care system after suicide attempt in Iran: barriers and insights from a mixed-method study

Despite ongoing efforts to provide hospital-based and post-discharge care for individuals who attempt suicide in Iran, the national suicide rates continue to rise. This study applied the Medical Research Council framework to systematically examine how the suicide follow-up care system is implemented in Shahriar city, Iran, identifying barriers and systemic challenges that affect service delivery. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were extracted from 992 cases of suicide attempts recorded between April and September 2023. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with 45 stakeholders, including mental health workers, hospital staff, mental health experts, and service users. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed through the Framework Method using MAXQDA software. Findings indicated that of the 992 individuals referred to follow-up services, only a small proportion (n = 15) engaged with designated health centers, and only three attended all sessions, indicating significant limitations in program reach. Qualitative analysis revealed nine thematic domains consistent with the MRC framework: infrastructure, information gaps, and human resource challenges within implementation mechanisms; participant experiences, and acceptability, related to impact mechanisms; and socioeconomic factors, stigma, organizational barriers, and access to means restriction as contextual components. This study provides a unique contribution by using a comprehensive framework to evaluate Iran’s national suicide follow-up system and its role in broader prevention efforts. The results indicate that the implementation of the Follow-up Care System faces substantial structural, organizational, and cultural barriers, including limited human resources, infrastructure gaps, delays in follow-up, and weak coordination between hospitals and health centers. Despite these challenges, some interventions provided emotional support and improved coping mechanisms. Findings emphasize the importance of program fidelity, staff training, and attention to social and cultural factors. Strengthening hospital-based follow-ups and improving data systems can enhance accessibility, participation, and overall effectiveness. This study offers valuable evidence for policymakers to address operational barriers and improve program implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07687-2
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the follow-up care system after suicide attempt in Iran: barriers and insights from a mixed-method study

Morteza Naserbakht, Shayesteh Zanjiran, Ahmad Hajebi, Fatemeh Shirzad et al.
BMC Psychiatry
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Evaluating the follow-up care system after suicide attempt in Iran: barriers and insights from a mixed-method study

Morteza Naserbakht, Shayesteh Zanjiran, Ahmad Hajebi, Fatemeh Shirzad, Ansar Khougar, Parisa Ahadi, Seyed Vahid Shariat, Forouzan Fahim, Mohammad Hadi Naseh
article en

Abstract

Despite ongoing efforts to provide hospital-based and post-discharge care for individuals who attempt suicide in Iran, the national suicide rates continue to rise. This study applied the Medical Research Council framework to systematically examine how the suicide follow-up care system is implemented in Shahriar city, Iran, identifying barriers and systemic challenges that affect service delivery. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were extracted from 992 cases of suicide attempts recorded between April and September 2023. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with 45 stakeholders, including mental health workers, hospital staff, mental health experts, and service users. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed through the Framework Method using MAXQDA software. Findings indicated that of the 992 individuals referred to follow-up services, only a small proportion (n = 15) engaged with designated health centers, and only three attended all sessions, indicating significant limitations in program reach. Qualitative analysis revealed nine thematic domains consistent with the MRC framework: infrastructure, information gaps, and human resource challenges within implementation mechanisms; participant experiences, and acceptability, related to impact mechanisms; and socioeconomic factors, stigma, organizational barriers, and access to means restriction as contextual components. This study provides a unique contribution by using a comprehensive framework to evaluate Iran’s national suicide follow-up system and its role in broader prevention efforts. The results indicate that the implementation of the Follow-up Care System faces substantial structural, organizational, and cultural barriers, including limited human resources, infrastructure gaps, delays in follow-up, and weak coordination between hospitals and health centers. Despite these challenges, some interventions provided emotional support and improved coping mechanisms. Findings emphasize the importance of program fidelity, staff training, and attention to social and cultural factors. Strengthening hospital-based follow-ups and improving data systems can enhance accessibility, participation, and overall effectiveness. This study offers valuable evidence for policymakers to address operational barriers and improve program implementation.

BMC PsychiatryVol. 26(1)
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.