Constructive disagreement and harmful hope in environmental communication for sustainability transition

We investigate how disagreeing is performed in conversations about circular economy futures, and how it is disturbed by discursive norms of hope. Disagreement is recognised as an interactive process essential for knowledge development and democracy. However, conducting democratic investigations of differences becomes difficult when interaction norms prioritise hopeful expressions. Drawing on 11 h of recorded meetings on the circular economy, we analyse how disagreement is interactively performed and link these observations about the constraining effects of ‘harmful hope’ to ideas of radical democracy and expectations surrounding hopeful environmental communication. We identify four discursive procedures of hope— community , appreciative coordination , concept innovation , and underlying disagreements , and demonstrate how these regulate and limit processes of agreeing and disagreeing, thereby influencing the conditions for constructive disagreement essential for democracy. Ultimately, we demonstrate how conversations about futures become dominated by norms of hope, which come at the expense of communicative capacity to constructively examine disagreements necessary for advancing sustainable transitions. This dynamic is evident even when the desired future involves radical transformations of production and consumption systems, as in the circular economy. Our study offers insights into what and how these discursive structures should be challenged in conversations about sustainability futures. • Disagreeing is an interactive process essential for knowledge development and democracy. • Circular economy talks are shaped by discursive norms of hope. • Democratic investigations of differences are difficult when interaction norms sanction hopeful expressions. • Four discursive procedures— community , coordination , concept innovation and underlying disagreements , shape agreeing and disagreeing. • The study shows why and how to challenge harmful norms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Futures
Published
2025-12-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2025.103750
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructive disagreement and harmful hope in environmental communication for sustainability transition

Lars Hallgren, Hanna Bergeå, Daniela Kreber
Futures
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Constructive disagreement and harmful hope in environmental communication for sustainability transition

Lars Hallgren, Hanna Bergeå, Daniela Kreber
article en

Abstract

We investigate how disagreeing is performed in conversations about circular economy futures, and how it is disturbed by discursive norms of hope. Disagreement is recognised as an interactive process essential for knowledge development and democracy. However, conducting democratic investigations of differences becomes difficult when interaction norms prioritise hopeful expressions. Drawing on 11 h of recorded meetings on the circular economy, we analyse how disagreement is interactively performed and link these observations about the constraining effects of ‘harmful hope’ to ideas of radical democracy and expectations surrounding hopeful environmental communication. We identify four discursive procedures of hope— community , appreciative coordination , concept innovation , and underlying disagreements , and demonstrate how these regulate and limit processes of agreeing and disagreeing, thereby influencing the conditions for constructive disagreement essential for democracy. Ultimately, we demonstrate how conversations about futures become dominated by norms of hope, which come at the expense of communicative capacity to constructively examine disagreements necessary for advancing sustainable transitions. This dynamic is evident even when the desired future involves radical transformations of production and consumption systems, as in the circular economy. Our study offers insights into what and how these discursive structures should be challenged in conversations about sustainability futures. • Disagreeing is an interactive process essential for knowledge development and democracy. • Circular economy talks are shaped by discursive norms of hope. • Democratic investigations of differences are difficult when interaction norms sanction hopeful expressions. • Four discursive procedures— community , coordination , concept innovation and underlying disagreements , shape agreeing and disagreeing. • The study shows why and how to challenge harmful norms.

FuturesVol. 176
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.