How relocation impacts wellbeing over time and across population groups: The case of Grantham, Australia

This article examines the planned relocation of Grantham, Australia that underwent a government-supported voluntary land-swap program following a catastrophic flood event in 2011. Using a wellbeing framing, this study investigates the long-term outcomes of the relocation, analysing perspectives of those who remained living in the old site, those who relocated to the new site, those who moved to Grantham after the relocation, and project staff involved in coordinating and managing the relocation process. Findings reveal that relocation has catalysed into diverse wellbeing outcomes for different population groups. While relocated individuals report enhanced physical safety, they also face emotional and psychological hardships, as do those who didn’t relocate. The research further highlights the complexities of community networks and cohesion, noting that the relocation process has led to divisions among residents based on perceived inequities in the relocation process, and the physical separation of the community. This division is experienced by not only those who live at the old site, and those living at the new site, but also newcomers to Grantham. Additionally, an experienced absence of essential community infrastructure, such as social hubs and transport services, has hindered the integration of relocated individuals and newcomers, further impacting broader wellbeing. While the relocation of Grantham was undoubtedly successful in reducing physical exposure for households who relocated, this article underscores the need and challenges in addressing not only physical safety in relocation planning but also the broader social, and psychological dimensions, offering insights for future policies and practices in disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation.