Assessing Nudge Impact: A Comprehensive Second‐Order Meta‐Analysis

ABSTRACT Nudging as a strategy to alter behaviors has garnered increasing attention from both researchers and policymakers. Here, we conduct a second‐order meta‐analysis, synthesizing 13 articles (14 meta‐analyses) that include 1638 primary studies and approximately 30 million participants. We find a small aggregated effect size across these meta‐analyses ( d = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16, 0.38]), which drops to d = 0.004 after adjusting for publication bias. Examining the methodological quality of the meta‐analyses, we find that most were rated as low or critically low, suggesting that our findings, which inherit these limitations, should be interpreted with caution. This study provides the most comprehensive synthesis of the effectiveness of nudging to date, while underscoring the urgent need for higher quality, preregistered meta‐analyses to clarify the true impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.70053
Primary Topic
Behavioral Health and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Nudge Impact: A Comprehensive Second‐Order Meta‐Analysis

Sara Madureira Constantino, Qian Guo, Ziqian Xia, Chang Lu et al.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Behavioral Health and Interventions
article

Assessing Nudge Impact: A Comprehensive Second‐Order Meta‐Analysis

Sara Madureira Constantino, Qian Guo, Ziqian Xia, Chang Lu, Xing‐Da Ju, Bo Hu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nudging as a strategy to alter behaviors has garnered increasing attention from both researchers and policymakers. Here, we conduct a second‐order meta‐analysis, synthesizing 13 articles (14 meta‐analyses) that include 1638 primary studies and approximately 30 million participants. We find a small aggregated effect size across these meta‐analyses ( d = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16, 0.38]), which drops to d = 0.004 after adjusting for publication bias. Examining the methodological quality of the meta‐analyses, we find that most were rated as low or critically low, suggesting that our findings, which inherit these limitations, should be interpreted with caution. This study provides the most comprehensive synthesis of the effectiveness of nudging to date, while underscoring the urgent need for higher quality, preregistered meta‐analyses to clarify the true impact.

Journal of Behavioral Decision MakingVol. 38(5)
Northeast Normal University (CN), Institute of Cognitive and Brain Sciences (US), Nanjing University (CN), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Behavioral Health and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing Nudge Impact: A Comprehensive Second‐Order Meta‐Analysis — Sara Madureira Constantino, Qian Guo, et al. · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS