#IAmPutin

Abstract This article examines how the Russian government engages in authoritarian legitimation by resisting the International Criminal Court (ICC) during its investigation into the situation in Ukraine. Authoritarian legitimation is conceptualized as the strategic use of rhetorical and legal mechanisms to justify state authority and consolidate domestic support for the regime’s policies. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of Russian-language media, with a particular focus on statements by the Russian political leadership shared via social media channels, this article examines how rhetorical strategies are utilized to defy and challenge the ICC. Additionally, the article examines the mechanisms of legal legitimation, highlighting how the Russian government has leveraged domestic legislation to avoid cooperation with the Court. By situating these strategies within a broader framework of authoritarian legitimation, the article offers a deeper understanding of how law, politics and popular rhetoric are intertwined to allow the exploitation of gaps in global accountability mechanisms and the reinforcement of authoritarian resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqaf050
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

#IAmPutin

Yuliya G. Zabyelina
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Global Security and Public Health
article

#IAmPutin

Yuliya G. Zabyelina
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how the Russian government engages in authoritarian legitimation by resisting the International Criminal Court (ICC) during its investigation into the situation in Ukraine. Authoritarian legitimation is conceptualized as the strategic use of rhetorical and legal mechanisms to justify state authority and consolidate domestic support for the regime’s policies. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of Russian-language media, with a particular focus on statements by the Russian political leadership shared via social media channels, this article examines how rhetorical strategies are utilized to defy and challenge the ICC. Additionally, the article examines the mechanisms of legal legitimation, highlighting how the Russian government has leveraged domestic legislation to avoid cooperation with the Court. By situating these strategies within a broader framework of authoritarian legitimation, the article offers a deeper understanding of how law, politics and popular rhetoric are intertwined to allow the exploitation of gaps in global accountability mechanisms and the reinforcement of authoritarian resilience.

Journal of International Criminal Justice
University of Alabama (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.