Getting to the <scp>COR</scp> of Workarounds: A Resource Perspective on Deviating Usage of Critical Care Information Systems

ABSTRACT Workarounds in high‐hazard environments like intensive care units (ICUs) compromise safety and regulatory compliance. While prior research attributes these deviations to technology misfits and notes self‐reinforcing dynamics, the underlying mechanisms of aggravating workaround spirals remain understudied. Drawing on ethnographic observation and interviews investigating Critical Care Information System (CCIS) use, we advance a mental resource perspective positioning clinicians' cognitive load as a key driver of aggravating workarounds. Grounded in Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory and organisational control literature, we demonstrate that clinicians use workarounds (i.e., deviating CCIS use) to cope with mental overload. However, workarounds bypass not only workflow obstacles, but also organisational controls intended to support individual and collective attention. As these ‘constructive IS attention controls’ collapse, clinicians' mental load intensifies and cooperative workflows deteriorate, spawning additional workarounds in a recursive cycle linking individual coping to collective resource depletion. Our study contributes theoretically by (1) identifying mental resource depletion as one mechanism aggravating workarounds, (2) specifying this mechanism through compromised attention management, and (3) developing a process model that integrates behavioural psychology with control theory to capture how individual resource deficits and coping scale to organisational level risks. For practice, we demonstrate that addressing isolated technology misfits is insufficient to mitigate workarounds in high‐acuity settings. Instead, systemic interventions are required, such as rebalancing workload, reinforcing resilient attention controls and designing CCIS that support (re‐)focusing individual and collective attention. These insights orient scholarship and management toward cognitively sustainable healthcare technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Systems Journal
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.70019
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting to the COR of Workarounds: A Resource Perspective on Deviating Usage of Critical Care Information Systems

Daniel Fürstenau, Stefan Josef Schaller, Alica Thissen, Felix Balzer et al.
Information Systems Journal
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Getting to the COR of Workarounds: A Resource Perspective on Deviating Usage of Critical Care Information Systems

Daniel Fürstenau, Stefan Josef Schaller, Alica Thissen, Felix Balzer, Martin Gersch, Christian Meske, Pauline Kuss
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Workarounds in high‐hazard environments like intensive care units (ICUs) compromise safety and regulatory compliance. While prior research attributes these deviations to technology misfits and notes self‐reinforcing dynamics, the underlying mechanisms of aggravating workaround spirals remain understudied. Drawing on ethnographic observation and interviews investigating Critical Care Information System (CCIS) use, we advance a mental resource perspective positioning clinicians' cognitive load as a key driver of aggravating workarounds. Grounded in Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory and organisational control literature, we demonstrate that clinicians use workarounds (i.e., deviating CCIS use) to cope with mental overload. However, workarounds bypass not only workflow obstacles, but also organisational controls intended to support individual and collective attention. As these ‘constructive IS attention controls’ collapse, clinicians' mental load intensifies and cooperative workflows deteriorate, spawning additional workarounds in a recursive cycle linking individual coping to collective resource depletion. Our study contributes theoretically by (1) identifying mental resource depletion as one mechanism aggravating workarounds, (2) specifying this mechanism through compromised attention management, and (3) developing a process model that integrates behavioural psychology with control theory to capture how individual resource deficits and coping scale to organisational level risks. For practice, we demonstrate that addressing isolated technology misfits is insufficient to mitigate workarounds in high‐acuity settings. Instead, systemic interventions are required, such as rebalancing workload, reinforcing resilient attention controls and designing CCIS that support (re‐)focusing individual and collective attention. These insights orient scholarship and management toward cognitively sustainable healthcare technologies.

Information Systems Journal
Berlin School of Economics and Law (DE), TUM Klinikum (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.