Weir removal for river restoration; observations on best practice and issues for a lowland UK river

Thousands of small river weirs have been constructed over the last ca. 1000 years or more to provide power for milling and crushing ore, for industrialisation, electricity generation and navigation. Alternative power generation and transportation methods have left many of these structures obsolete and/or derelict. Recently, there has been a drive to create ‘free-flowing’ rivers with fewer or no barriers thereby increasing connectivity and improving ecology. Our first aim was to explore a range of literature and legislation on weir removal in the UK and identify the key benefits and drawbacks in removal that have emerged. We found that ecology was only one of many themes that could be used to justify weir removal or retention. Our second aim was to explore the issues involved with weir removal in a lowland river system in the UK based on the West Sussex Rother where three weirs were being considered for removal. The smothering of ecologically important river gravels by sand trapped behind these weirs and the subsequent release of this sand on removal emerged as a potentially new issue not identified in the literature reviewed. Our third aim was to explore management structures and key stakeholders involved in decision making in the Rother catchment, to establish whether a coordinated approach to delivering weir removal as part of a river management plan could be successfully delivered. We found many official and unofficial organisations have a legal or potentially legitimate interest in the Rother that could produce conflicting evidence for the benefits of weir removal. We conclude that strong leadership and good coordination are required to deliver a successful outcome that requires not only consideration of all the issues involved but which promotes public engagement, and the delivery of an evidence base by monitoring the consequences of any management action.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333251407020
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weir removal for river restoration; observations on best practice and issues for a lowland UK river

Atish N. Vadher, John Boardman, Ruth Copeland‐Phillips, Ian Foster et al.
Progress in Physical Geography Earth and Environment
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
article

Weir removal for river restoration; observations on best practice and issues for a lowland UK river

Atish N. Vadher, John Boardman, Ruth Copeland‐Phillips, Ian Foster, Toby N. Tonkin
article en

Abstract

Thousands of small river weirs have been constructed over the last ca. 1000 years or more to provide power for milling and crushing ore, for industrialisation, electricity generation and navigation. Alternative power generation and transportation methods have left many of these structures obsolete and/or derelict. Recently, there has been a drive to create ‘free-flowing’ rivers with fewer or no barriers thereby increasing connectivity and improving ecology. Our first aim was to explore a range of literature and legislation on weir removal in the UK and identify the key benefits and drawbacks in removal that have emerged. We found that ecology was only one of many themes that could be used to justify weir removal or retention. Our second aim was to explore the issues involved with weir removal in a lowland river system in the UK based on the West Sussex Rother where three weirs were being considered for removal. The smothering of ecologically important river gravels by sand trapped behind these weirs and the subsequent release of this sand on removal emerged as a potentially new issue not identified in the literature reviewed. Our third aim was to explore management structures and key stakeholders involved in decision making in the Rother catchment, to establish whether a coordinated approach to delivering weir removal as part of a river management plan could be successfully delivered. We found many official and unofficial organisations have a legal or potentially legitimate interest in the Rother that could produce conflicting evidence for the benefits of weir removal. We conclude that strong leadership and good coordination are required to deliver a successful outcome that requires not only consideration of all the issues involved but which promotes public engagement, and the delivery of an evidence base by monitoring the consequences of any management action.

Progress in Physical Geography Earth and EnvironmentVol. 50(2)
Loughborough University (GB), Rhodes University (ZA), University of the Free State (ZA), University of Northampton (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.