Reading numbers is hard, and the difficulty is a syntactic one: a descriptive analysis of number-reading patterns in readers with and without dysnumeria

Number transcoding, the ability to convert digits to words and vice versa, is a critical skill in mathematical literacy and in everyday life. While transcoding is known to be difficult for children, it is unclear whether it challenges adults too, and if so, what the source of that difficulty is. Here, we analyzed the number reading performance of 172 neurotypical adults. Their mean error rate was 6.5%, considerably higher than that typically observed in word-reading tasks, indicating that transcoding is a relatively challenging task even in adulthood. To investigate the cognitive origin of this difficulty, we examined the error types produced by these participants, as well as by a second group of 51 adults with a number-reading deficit (dysnumeria, mean error rate of 28.7%). In both groups, most errors reflected corruptions of the number's syntactic structure. Moreover, among adults with dysnumeria, the most common subtype was syntactic dysnumeria. These findings indicate that, as in children, the primary challenge in adult number reading lies in the processing of the number's syntactic structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00694-7
Primary Topic
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reading numbers is hard, and the difficulty is a syntactic one: a descriptive analysis of number-reading patterns in readers with and without dysnumeria

Noa Handelsman, Dror Dotan
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
article

Reading numbers is hard, and the difficulty is a syntactic one: a descriptive analysis of number-reading patterns in readers with and without dysnumeria

Noa Handelsman, Dror Dotan
article en

Abstract

Number transcoding, the ability to convert digits to words and vice versa, is a critical skill in mathematical literacy and in everyday life. While transcoding is known to be difficult for children, it is unclear whether it challenges adults too, and if so, what the source of that difficulty is. Here, we analyzed the number reading performance of 172 neurotypical adults. Their mean error rate was 6.5%, considerably higher than that typically observed in word-reading tasks, indicating that transcoding is a relatively challenging task even in adulthood. To investigate the cognitive origin of this difficulty, we examined the error types produced by these participants, as well as by a second group of 51 adults with a number-reading deficit (dysnumeria, mean error rate of 28.7%). In both groups, most errors reflected corruptions of the number's syntactic structure. Moreover, among adults with dysnumeria, the most common subtype was syntactic dysnumeria. These findings indicate that, as in children, the primary challenge in adult number reading lies in the processing of the number's syntactic structure.

Cognitive Research Principles and ImplicationsVol. 10(1)
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Jacobs Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reading numbers is hard, and the difficulty is a syntactic one: a descriptive analysis of number-reading patterns in readers with and without dysnumeria — Noa Handelsman, Dror Dotan · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS