Decoding Food Labels: How and Why Labels Influence Consumers' Responses

ABSTRACT Consumers make hundreds of food‐related decisions daily, often relying on labels to guide their choices. While extensive research has examined whether food labels are effective and which label types outperform others, limited work has explained how and why labels influence consumers' responses. To address this limitation, we conducted a systematic literature review grounded in high‐impact, up‐to‐date research on food labeling, analyzing 243 peer‐reviewed articles published in top‐tier journals between 2016 and 2025. By integrating the dual‐process theory lens to the Antecedents–Decisions–Outcomes (ADO) framework, we introduce the Food Labeling Processing model to map how labeling types (antecedents) engage different intuitive (System 1) and deliberative (System 2) processing styles (decisions), leading to various consumers' responses (outcomes). The proposed framework contributes to the literature by offering a theory‐driven conceptual synthesis that repositions food‐labeling research within the broader architecture of the dual‐process theory. Drawing on literature gaps identified through our proposed framework, we put forward a set of testable propositions grounded in consumer psychology research that future studies can explore to advance the field. Finally, we offer practical contributions by detailing how each proposition can inform public policy and marketing implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70092
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding Food Labels: How and Why Labels Influence Consumers' Responses

Murilo Lima Araújo Costa, Ana Tereza Delapedra, Daniela Zacarchenco Paredes, Anna Karolina Barbosa da Silva
Psychology and Marketing
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Decoding Food Labels: How and Why Labels Influence Consumers' Responses

Murilo Lima Araújo Costa, Ana Tereza Delapedra, Daniela Zacarchenco Paredes, Anna Karolina Barbosa da Silva
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Consumers make hundreds of food‐related decisions daily, often relying on labels to guide their choices. While extensive research has examined whether food labels are effective and which label types outperform others, limited work has explained how and why labels influence consumers' responses. To address this limitation, we conducted a systematic literature review grounded in high‐impact, up‐to‐date research on food labeling, analyzing 243 peer‐reviewed articles published in top‐tier journals between 2016 and 2025. By integrating the dual‐process theory lens to the Antecedents–Decisions–Outcomes (ADO) framework, we introduce the Food Labeling Processing model to map how labeling types (antecedents) engage different intuitive (System 1) and deliberative (System 2) processing styles (decisions), leading to various consumers' responses (outcomes). The proposed framework contributes to the literature by offering a theory‐driven conceptual synthesis that repositions food‐labeling research within the broader architecture of the dual‐process theory. Drawing on literature gaps identified through our proposed framework, we put forward a set of testable propositions grounded in consumer psychology research that future studies can explore to advance the field. Finally, we offer practical contributions by detailing how each proposition can inform public policy and marketing implications.

Psychology and MarketingVol. 43(4)
Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.