Psychological responses to training within simulated urban and subterranean operational environments

Future large-scale combat operations (LSCOs) will place considerable strains on warfighting and peacekeeping capabilities, particularly mission sets that require execution of critical military functions within urban and/or rural subterranean (SubT) environments. Despite substantial investment in modernizing military tactics and technology to neutralize threats or exploit situational affordances in underground contexts, limited empirical data are available from service member populations operating in SubT conditions. We followed a cohort of chemical, radiological, biological, and nuclear (CBRN) response teams as their units completed multi-day CBRN training events in above-ground or underground environments (e.g. facilities, tunnels, other structures). In addition to baseline individual differences, we assessed pre- and post-training psychological and cognitive functioning and other factors associated with stress responses and performance during training. Results suggest training events imparted a significant amount of stress on participants, with positive associations observed between self-reported demand, effort, anxiety, and sensitivity to protective gear. Reduced cognitive functioning (response time, accuracy) post-training was also evidenced post-training, but SubT environments engendered worse, and more variable, cognitive performance compared to above-ground locations. Previous training experiences in this cohort (few in underground contexts) were associated with emotion regulation ability and coping skills. An adapted measure of SubT operational potential demonstrated utility in the current sample based on positive associations with previous experience, navigation skills, resilience, problem-focused coping, and positive affect, as well as negative associations with self-regulation difficulties, phobias, and anxiety. Findings are discussed in a LSCO context that could require short- and long-term subterranean missions executed within a multidomain operational framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Military Psychology
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2025.2595802
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological responses to training within simulated urban and subterranean operational environments

Benjamin Trachik, Terry Thomas, Jeffrey M. Osgood, Michelle L. Ganulin et al.
Military Psychology
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Psychological responses to training within simulated urban and subterranean operational environments

Benjamin Trachik, Terry Thomas, Jeffrey M. Osgood, Michelle L. Ganulin, Bradley Fawver, Nathan T. Kearns, David Henry, Michaela K. Monson, Julie C. Merrill, Michael N. Dretsch, Uzi Ben‐Shalom
article en

Abstract

Future large-scale combat operations (LSCOs) will place considerable strains on warfighting and peacekeeping capabilities, particularly mission sets that require execution of critical military functions within urban and/or rural subterranean (SubT) environments. Despite substantial investment in modernizing military tactics and technology to neutralize threats or exploit situational affordances in underground contexts, limited empirical data are available from service member populations operating in SubT conditions. We followed a cohort of chemical, radiological, biological, and nuclear (CBRN) response teams as their units completed multi-day CBRN training events in above-ground or underground environments (e.g. facilities, tunnels, other structures). In addition to baseline individual differences, we assessed pre- and post-training psychological and cognitive functioning and other factors associated with stress responses and performance during training. Results suggest training events imparted a significant amount of stress on participants, with positive associations observed between self-reported demand, effort, anxiety, and sensitivity to protective gear. Reduced cognitive functioning (response time, accuracy) post-training was also evidenced post-training, but SubT environments engendered worse, and more variable, cognitive performance compared to above-ground locations. Previous training experiences in this cohort (few in underground contexts) were associated with emotion regulation ability and coping skills. An adapted measure of SubT operational potential demonstrated utility in the current sample based on positive associations with previous experience, navigation skills, resilience, problem-focused coping, and positive affect, as well as negative associations with self-regulation difficulties, phobias, and anxiety. Findings are discussed in a LSCO context that could require short- and long-term subterranean missions executed within a multidomain operational framework.

Military Psychology
RAND Corporation (US), Ariel University (IL), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.