S1658 Gastroenterologist Follow-Up Is Associated With Reduced Readmission Compared to Primary Care After Hospitalization for Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Introduction: Patients hospitalized for severe ulcerative colitis (UC) flares are at high risk of readmission, yet guidelines offer limited direction for post-discharge care. Prior studies suggest timely outpatient follow-up with a gastroenterology (GI) specialist may reduce readmission risk, but the impact of provider type remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether post-discharge follow-up with a primary care provider (PCP) influences readmission risk. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for UC flare at Stanford University Hospital between 2010 and 2021. The primary outcome was time to a GI-related readmission. The primary exposure was provider type at first follow-up visit (GI vs PCP vs no follow-up), modeled as a time-dependent covariate in Cox proportional hazards regression. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and albumin at admission. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests compared cumulative readmission risk between PCP follow-up and no follow-up. Results: Of the 223 patients included for analysis, 156 (70.0%) had follow-up with a GI specialist, 28 (12.3%) had PCP follow-up, and 39 (17.4%) had no follow-up during the study period. Median time to follow-up was shorter in the PCP group (5 days, IQR 6 days) than in the GI specialist group (10 days, IQR 14 days). PCP follow-up was not associated with reduced readmission compared to no follow-up (adjusted HR 1.40; 95%-CI, 0.63-3.15; P = 0.41). Follow-up with a GI specialist was associated with a significantly lower readmission risk (adjusted HR 0.46; 95%-CI, 0.24-0.87; P = 0.016). Conclusion: Our results highlight the importance of provider type in post-discharge care after hospitalization for severe UC. Despite earlier follow-up, PCP evaluation did not reduce readmissions, while follow-up with a GI specialist was significantly associated with reduced readmission rates. This suggests that GI-specific care in the post-discharge phase is important for recognizing early relapse, optimizing therapies, and preventing readmissions. Thus, ensuring access to GI should be prioritized in care pathways for post-discharge UC management. To further elucidate this, future studies should evaluate whether follow-up with GI-specific advanced practice providers confers a similar reduction of readmissions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134092.20112.a7
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1658 Gastroenterologist Follow-Up Is Associated With Reduced Readmission Compared to Primary Care After Hospitalization for Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Sarah E. Streett, Grant E. Barber, Zhuo Justin, Ola A. Selnes
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1658 Gastroenterologist Follow-Up Is Associated With Reduced Readmission Compared to Primary Care After Hospitalization for Severe Ulcerative Colitis

Sarah E. Streett, Grant E. Barber, Zhuo Justin, Ola A. Selnes
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients hospitalized for severe ulcerative colitis (UC) flares are at high risk of readmission, yet guidelines offer limited direction for post-discharge care. Prior studies suggest timely outpatient follow-up with a gastroenterology (GI) specialist may reduce readmission risk, but the impact of provider type remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether post-discharge follow-up with a primary care provider (PCP) influences readmission risk. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for UC flare at Stanford University Hospital between 2010 and 2021. The primary outcome was time to a GI-related readmission. The primary exposure was provider type at first follow-up visit (GI vs PCP vs no follow-up), modeled as a time-dependent covariate in Cox proportional hazards regression. Models were adjusted for age, sex, and albumin at admission. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests compared cumulative readmission risk between PCP follow-up and no follow-up. Results: Of the 223 patients included for analysis, 156 (70.0%) had follow-up with a GI specialist, 28 (12.3%) had PCP follow-up, and 39 (17.4%) had no follow-up during the study period. Median time to follow-up was shorter in the PCP group (5 days, IQR 6 days) than in the GI specialist group (10 days, IQR 14 days). PCP follow-up was not associated with reduced readmission compared to no follow-up (adjusted HR 1.40; 95%-CI, 0.63-3.15; P = 0.41). Follow-up with a GI specialist was associated with a significantly lower readmission risk (adjusted HR 0.46; 95%-CI, 0.24-0.87; P = 0.016). Conclusion: Our results highlight the importance of provider type in post-discharge care after hospitalization for severe UC. Despite earlier follow-up, PCP evaluation did not reduce readmissions, while follow-up with a GI specialist was significantly associated with reduced readmission rates. This suggests that GI-specific care in the post-discharge phase is important for recognizing early relapse, optimizing therapies, and preventing readmissions. Thus, ensuring access to GI should be prioritized in care pathways for post-discharge UC management. To further elucidate this, future studies should evaluate whether follow-up with GI-specific advanced practice providers confers a similar reduction of readmissions.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.