S1657 Association Between Vedolizumab Trough Concentration and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective, anti-integrin humanised monoclonal antibody that selectively targets α4β7 integrin, widely used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The treatment response is variable, and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in optimising vedolizumab therapy remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between vedolizumab trough concentrations (VTC) and clinical, endoscopic, and histologic outcomes in patients with IBD to guide the use of TDM in clinical practice. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus was performed applying Boolean operators and MeSH keywords. PRISMA standards were followed, and the study was pre-registered on PROSPERO. Two authors independently screened 1,066 records after removing duplicates. Twelve studies were included based on the inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were clinical, endoscopic, and biologic remission; secondary outcomes were mucosal healing, steroid-free remission, response to dose optimisation, and adverse events. Risk of bias was evaluated using the NIH tool. Synthesising the data used Review Manager (RevMan v5.4.1), and pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals were determined using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 12 observational studies involving 3,259 patients with IBD (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) were included. In the pooled proportion, clinical remission was 44% (95% CI: 13–80%), endoscopic remission 33% (95% CI: 23–43%), and steroid-free remission 39% (95% CI: 24–56%). Mucosal healing was seen in 37% of the patients (95% CI: 28–47%). The mean VTC was 18.76 μg/mL (95% CI: 12.18–25.34). The pooled response rate was 48% (95% CI: 30–67%) in patients who received dose optimisation. Serious adverse events were rare, with an overall occurrence of 8% (95% CI: 2–22%). Heterogeneity was extreme (I² = 95%), largely due to an outlier study, which was supported by sensitivity analyses and Baujat. Conclusion: This study implies a strong relationship between greater VTC and better clinical, endoscopic, and histologic results in IBD. Pooled data shows that VTC ≥18–24 μg/mL during induction and ≥12 μg/mL during maintenance are associated with remission. Optimal dosing resulted in ∼50% response. Vedolizumab was very safe, with low immunogenicity and very few serious adverse events. The findings from the study support VTC-guided dosing in practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134088.02856.be
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1657 Association Between Vedolizumab Trough Concentration and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adnan Bhat, Yousef M. Husseiny, Kesava Reddy, Ammarah Tariq et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1657 Association Between Vedolizumab Trough Concentration and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Adnan Bhat, Yousef M. Husseiny, Kesava Reddy, Ammarah Tariq, Nausheen Nazir, Anika Goel, Muhammad Uzair, Ayesha Arshad, Shree Rath, Ammara Tahir, Arun Kumar Maloth, Fatima Aslam, Mohamed N. Abohalawa
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective, anti-integrin humanised monoclonal antibody that selectively targets α4β7 integrin, widely used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The treatment response is variable, and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in optimising vedolizumab therapy remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between vedolizumab trough concentrations (VTC) and clinical, endoscopic, and histologic outcomes in patients with IBD to guide the use of TDM in clinical practice. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus was performed applying Boolean operators and MeSH keywords. PRISMA standards were followed, and the study was pre-registered on PROSPERO. Two authors independently screened 1,066 records after removing duplicates. Twelve studies were included based on the inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were clinical, endoscopic, and biologic remission; secondary outcomes were mucosal healing, steroid-free remission, response to dose optimisation, and adverse events. Risk of bias was evaluated using the NIH tool. Synthesising the data used Review Manager (RevMan v5.4.1), and pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals were determined using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 12 observational studies involving 3,259 patients with IBD (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) were included. In the pooled proportion, clinical remission was 44% (95% CI: 13–80%), endoscopic remission 33% (95% CI: 23–43%), and steroid-free remission 39% (95% CI: 24–56%). Mucosal healing was seen in 37% of the patients (95% CI: 28–47%). The mean VTC was 18.76 μg/mL (95% CI: 12.18–25.34). The pooled response rate was 48% (95% CI: 30–67%) in patients who received dose optimisation. Serious adverse events were rare, with an overall occurrence of 8% (95% CI: 2–22%). Heterogeneity was extreme (I² = 95%), largely due to an outlier study, which was supported by sensitivity analyses and Baujat. Conclusion: This study implies a strong relationship between greater VTC and better clinical, endoscopic, and histologic results in IBD. Pooled data shows that VTC ≥18–24 μg/mL during induction and ≥12 μg/mL during maintenance are associated with remission. Optimal dosing resulted in ∼50% response. Vedolizumab was very safe, with low immunogenicity and very few serious adverse events. The findings from the study support VTC-guided dosing in practice.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.