Inhibitory potential of autologous neutralizing antibodies sets quantitative limits on the rebound-competent HIV-1 reservoir

HIV-1 cure requires preventing viral rebound after treatment interruption, but quantitative criteria defining the rebound-competent reservoir are lacking. We studied individuals undergoing observational treatment interruption to identify virologic and immunologic determinants of rebound. In 9 of 13 participants, rebound viruses were genetically identical or similar to proviruses in circulating resting CD4⁺ T-cells. We found no evidence of recombination among rebound sequences, rather resistance to autologous neutralizing antibodies was a critical determinant of viral rebound. Using inhibitory potential ( <i>IP</i> ), the log reduction in single-round infection at physiologic IgG concentrations, we defined quantitative limits governing rebound-competency. Reservoir variants exhibited a wide range of <i>IP</i> values (0.4-8.2 logs), whereas rebound viruses were minimally inhibited (0.5-2.8 logs), indicating that inhibition by even up to 2.8 logs (631-fold) cannot prevent rebound. Longitudinal analyses revealed that waning aNAb potency allows previously neutralized variants to gain rebound potential. Thus, rebound competency is a dynamic, immune-governed property defined by quantitative immunologic constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.07.692769
Primary Topic
HIV Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inhibitory potential of autologous neutralizing antibodies sets quantitative limits on the rebound-competent HIV-1 reservoir

Janet D. Siliciano, Thomas Dalhuisen, Dylan H. Westfall, Rebecca Hoh et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
HIV Research and Treatment
article

Inhibitory potential of autologous neutralizing antibodies sets quantitative limits on the rebound-competent HIV-1 reservoir

Janet D. Siliciano, Thomas Dalhuisen, Dylan H. Westfall, Rebecca Hoh, Lillian B. Cohn, Brianna Lopez, Francesco R. Simonetti, Mauro Garcia, Emily J. Fray, Jun Lai, Michael J. Peluso, Tingting Chu, Joseph Varriale, Steven G. Deeks, Junlin Zhuo, Haoyue Li, Robert F. Siliciano, Beril Aydin, Kirsten J. Sowers, Anna Farrell-Sherman, Anthony Abeyta-Lopez, Donald Lubbeck, Moonki Chae, Anna M. Zinsser
article en

Abstract

HIV-1 cure requires preventing viral rebound after treatment interruption, but quantitative criteria defining the rebound-competent reservoir are lacking. We studied individuals undergoing observational treatment interruption to identify virologic and immunologic determinants of rebound. In 9 of 13 participants, rebound viruses were genetically identical or similar to proviruses in circulating resting CD4⁺ T-cells. We found no evidence of recombination among rebound sequences, rather resistance to autologous neutralizing antibodies was a critical determinant of viral rebound. Using inhibitory potential ( <i>IP</i> ), the log reduction in single-round infection at physiologic IgG concentrations, we defined quantitative limits governing rebound-competency. Reservoir variants exhibited a wide range of <i>IP</i> values (0.4-8.2 logs), whereas rebound viruses were minimally inhibited (0.5-2.8 logs), indicating that inhibition by even up to 2.8 logs (631-fold) cannot prevent rebound. Longitudinal analyses revealed that waning aNAb potency allows previously neutralized variants to gain rebound potential. Thus, rebound competency is a dynamic, immune-governed property defined by quantitative immunologic constraints.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), University of San Francisco (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
HIV Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.