S1682 Comparison of Coronary Calcium CT Scores in Patients With IBD vs Patients Without IBD

Introduction: Prior studies have suggested that patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of thromboembolic events. However, there is conflicting data regarding risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in this patient population, with a prior study at an academic center suggesting higher ASCVD risk for IBD patients assessed by cardiac CT. In this study, we sought to assess ASCVD risk of patients with IBD by comparing coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores in patients with IBD to a matched control group in a community setting. Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study of adult patients within the Advocate Aurora Health system who had a CAC score CT performed between May 2012 and May 2022. For subjects with multiple studies, the most recent CAC score was collected. The case group included patients with a documented history of IBD. A 2:1 age and sex matched control group was created. Charts were manually reviewed to confirm the presence or absence of IBD based on standard criteria. CAD risk factors, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, and family or personal history of CAD/myocardial infarction, were also collected. CAC scores were divided into 4 categories: no identifiable coronary disease (CAC score 0), mild coronary disease (1-99), moderate coronary disease (100-399) or severe coronary disease (≥400). Categorical data were compared using Chi square, and CAC scores using the Mann Whitney U test. Results: There were 1332 patients in the IBD group and 2761 matched controls (median age 62). Prevalence of CAD risk factors was similar in the case and control populations. There was no identifiable CAD in 588 (44.1%) of cases and 1106 (40.1%) of controls, mild disease in 393 (29.5%) vs 857 (31.0%), moderate disease in 196 (14.7%) vs 415 (15.0%), and severe disease in 155 (11.64%) vs 382 (13.84%) respectively (P = 0.0855). Median CAC scores were 5.0 in the case population and 9.0 in the control group (P = 0.0176). In Crohn’s patients (n = 608), median CAC score was 3.9 vs 6.0 in ulcerative colitis patients (n = 727), (P = 0.6516). Conclusion: In our study of a community-based population, IBD patients had lower ASCVD risk compared to controls as assessed by CAC score, suggesting that IBD is not an independent risk factor for CAD.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001134188.91145.d1
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1682 Comparison of Coronary Calcium CT Scores in Patients With IBD vs Patients Without IBD

Ashley Robinson, Cindy Ndiaye, Eli D. Ehrenpreis, Saad Hashmi et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1682 Comparison of Coronary Calcium CT Scores in Patients With IBD vs Patients Without IBD

Ashley Robinson, Cindy Ndiaye, Eli D. Ehrenpreis, Saad Hashmi, Ahmed Khattab, Sareena Ali, Yannis S. Lafazanos, Lukus Berber
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Prior studies have suggested that patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have an increased risk of thromboembolic events. However, there is conflicting data regarding risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in this patient population, with a prior study at an academic center suggesting higher ASCVD risk for IBD patients assessed by cardiac CT. In this study, we sought to assess ASCVD risk of patients with IBD by comparing coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores in patients with IBD to a matched control group in a community setting. Methods: We performed a retrospective case-control study of adult patients within the Advocate Aurora Health system who had a CAC score CT performed between May 2012 and May 2022. For subjects with multiple studies, the most recent CAC score was collected. The case group included patients with a documented history of IBD. A 2:1 age and sex matched control group was created. Charts were manually reviewed to confirm the presence or absence of IBD based on standard criteria. CAD risk factors, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, and family or personal history of CAD/myocardial infarction, were also collected. CAC scores were divided into 4 categories: no identifiable coronary disease (CAC score 0), mild coronary disease (1-99), moderate coronary disease (100-399) or severe coronary disease (≥400). Categorical data were compared using Chi square, and CAC scores using the Mann Whitney U test. Results: There were 1332 patients in the IBD group and 2761 matched controls (median age 62). Prevalence of CAD risk factors was similar in the case and control populations. There was no identifiable CAD in 588 (44.1%) of cases and 1106 (40.1%) of controls, mild disease in 393 (29.5%) vs 857 (31.0%), moderate disease in 196 (14.7%) vs 415 (15.0%), and severe disease in 155 (11.64%) vs 382 (13.84%) respectively (P = 0.0855). Median CAC scores were 5.0 in the case population and 9.0 in the control group (P = 0.0176). In Crohn’s patients (n = 608), median CAC score was 3.9 vs 6.0 in ulcerative colitis patients (n = 727), (P = 0.6516). Conclusion: In our study of a community-based population, IBD patients had lower ASCVD risk compared to controls as assessed by CAC score, suggesting that IBD is not an independent risk factor for CAD.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.